Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An analysis of strategic goals and public procurement strategy regarding the implementation of The National Program for Land Registration in Romania

Bibliographic Data

ID11468189
AuthorsVlad Păunescu (University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest), Alexandru-Iulian Iliescu (University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest), Tudor Sălăgean (0000-0003-2096-9882, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, corresponding author), Elemer-Emanuel Şuba (University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca), Mircea-Emil Nap (0000-0002-2805-4188, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca)
Year2024
Volume146
Pages107334
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Use Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107334
OpenAlexW4402081377
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited46

The National Program for Land Registration was supposed to be completed by 2023 with the registration of all administrative units in Romania. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility and acceptance of the strategic objectives of this project and the public procurement strategy in the view of three types of stakeholders involved in the project: private sector providers, cadastre academics and local cadastre offices directors. It is the first study that analyses The National Program for Land Registration from this perspective. The research shows that, in the view of the stakeholders questioned the strategic objectives were not feasible and they weren’t consulted in designing them, making the objectives unacceptable. In regards to the public procurement strategy, the results of the study show that the targets set were not clear, there is not enough competition in the market and the awarding criteria lack a balance between quality and price. • For a complete land registration national project, the strategic objectives have to be feasible to the stakeholders involved. • Public procurement strategy in land registration projects has to comply with EU regulations. • The stakeholders' opinion has to be considered in the land registration process when designing public procurements strategies. • Stakeholders that work in state institutions have a tendency to provide “socially desirable” answers in surveys

Archaeology · Business · Economics · Engineering management · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Land registration · Political science · Process management · Procurement · Regional science · Sociology · Strategic planning · Auction Theory and Applications · Engineering · Public Administration · Public Procurement and Policy · Urban Planning and Valuation · Marketing

  • Finding potential land use policies for transboundary river basin to resolve harsh land-population relationship under flood risks

    Open Access•Songhua Huan•Land Use Policy•2026

  • Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies

    Morten Jakobsen, Rasmus Lund Jensen et al.•International Public Management…•2015

  • Social Desirability Response Effects

    Daniel C Ganster, Harry W Hennessey et al.•Academy of Management Journal•1983

  • Reliable 2D Crowdsourced Cadastral Surveys

    Open Access•Chryssy Potsiou, Cornel Păunescu et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2020

  • Lessons from Systematic Evaluation of Land Administration Systems. The Case of Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia

    Open Access•Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, Helmut Fuchs et al.•World Development•2015

  • Pro-poor land administration

    Open Access•J A Zevenbergen, Jaap Zevenbergen et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Land reform and land fragmentation in Central and Eastern Europe

    Open Access•Morten Hartvigsen, Morten B Hartvigsen•Land Use Policy•2014

  • A methodological evaluation of the Polish cadastral system based on the global cadastral model

    Open Access•Agnieszka Dawidowicz, Ryszard Źróbek•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Identifying global parameters for advancing Land Administration Systems

    Open Access•Fatemeh Jahani Chehrehbargh, Abbas Rajabifard et al.•Land Use Policy•2024

  • Does regional VRIO model help policy-makers to assess the resources of a region? A stakeholder perception approach

    Open Access•João M Lopes, João Lopes et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Development of agricultural land markets in countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia

    Open Access•Maxim Gorgan, Morten Hartvigsen et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Evaluating land administration systems

    Open Access•Pablo Bandeira, Jose Maria Sumpsi et al.•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Evaluation of land administration systems

    Open Access•Daniel Steudler, Abbas Rajabifard et al.•Land Use Policy•2004

  • Challenges of sporadic land registration in Palestine

    Open Access•Mahmoud Fayyad, Abdel Raouf Al-Sinnawi•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Urban land tenure policy options

    Open Access•Geoff Payne, Geoffrey Payne•Habitat International•2001

  • Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis

    Gibson Burrell, Gareth J Morgan et al.•Sociological Paradigms and…•2021

  • Research Paradigms and Meaning Making

    Open Access•Steven Eric Krau, Steven Krauss•Qualitative Report•2015

  • Qualitative Research Design

    Open Access•Mary Anne Pitman•Anthropology & Education Quarterly•1998

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae