A new learning and skills landscape? The central role of the Learning and Skills Council
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11487540 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Frank Coffield (0000-0002-0346-990X, University of London, autor correspondente), Richard Steer (0000-0002-9638-6125, University of East London), Ann Hodgson (University of East London), Ken Spours (University of London), Sheila Edward (University of East London), Ian Finlay (University of Strathclyde) |
| Ano | 2005 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 631-656 |
| Data de publicação | 2005-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Education Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0268-0939 • E-ISSN: 1464-5106 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02680930500222493 |
| OpenAlex | W2086249281 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
This is the first paper from a project which is part of the Economic and Social Research Council’s Programme of research into “Teaching and Learning”. The project, entitled “The Impact of Policy on Learning and Inclusion in the New Learning and Skills Sector”, explores what impact the efforts to create a single learning and skills system (LSS) are having on teaching, learning, assessment and inclusion for three marginalised groups of post-16 learners. Drawing primarily on policy documents and 62 in-depth interviews with national, regional and local policymakers in England, the paper points to a complex, confusing and constantly changing landscape; in particular, it deals with the formation, early years and recent reorganisation of the Learning and Skills Council (LSC), its roles, relations with Government, its rather limited power, its partnerships and likely futures. While the formation of a more unified LSS is broadly seen as a necessary step in overcoming the fragmentation and inequalities of the previous post-16 sector, interviewees also highlighted problems, some of which may not simply abate with the passing of time. Political expectations of change are high, but the LSC and its partners are expected to carry through ‘transformational’ strategies without the necessary ‘tools for the job’. In addition, some features of the LSS policy landscape still remain unreformed or need to be reorganised. The LSC and its partners are at the receiving end of a series of policy drivers (eg planning, funding, targets, inspection and initiatives) that may have partial or even perverse effects on the groups of marginalised learners we are studying
Business · Futures contract · Inclusion (mineral · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Skills management · Social science · Sociology · Transformational leadership · Education Systems and Policy · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Reluctant Leaders
Scoring opportunity or hospital pass? The changing role of local authorities in 14–19 education and training in England
Certifying the workforce
An analytical framework for policy engagement
How policy impacts on practice and how practice does not impact on policy
Working together? Partnership approaches to 14–19 education in England
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,3 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2006 - 2010 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |