Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Privatising public schools via product pipelines

Teach For Australia, policy networks and profit

Bibliographic Data

ID11487569
AuthorsEmma Rowe (0000-0002-3747-8070, Deakin University, corresponding author), Sarah Langman (0000-0002-4175-1367, Institute for Learning Sciences & Teacher Education (ILSTE), Australian Catholic University, East Melbourne, Australia), Christopher Lubienski (0000-0001-7372-5801, Indiana University)
Year2024
Volume39
Issue3
Pages384-409
Publication date2024-05-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Education Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-0939 • E-ISSN: 1464-5106
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02680939.2023.2266431
OpenAlexW4387460910
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited38

Drawing upon a long-term study of venture philanthropy and public schools in Australia, this paper focuses on Teach For Australia (TFA) as a major component of a venture philanthropic network, one that builds critical infrastructures and connections between non-government organisations and the state, creating a product pipeline into public schools. Utilising interviews with staff from Teach For Australia and venture philanthropic organisations, comprehensive and rigorous financial data, reviews, reports and website data, the analysis aims to identify the major philanthropic funders, individual actors and private foundations that leverage Teach For Australia, illustrating how this network develops for-profit pathways into public schools. In pushing a deficit framing of public schools, these networks incur privatisation effects, including flows of money, resources and key decision-making. They compromise the democratic principles upon which public schools are ideally based, in that the most disadvantaged public schools are opened up to 'entrepreneurial' and risk-taking corporate behaviour to test out teachers, products and services. By examining streams of revenue, partnerships and networks, we show how the purportedly non-profit Teach For Australia develops for-profit opportunities and business partnerships nested in corporate philanthropy, resulting in a privatisation effect on public schools

Business · Compromise · Disadvantaged · Economic growth · Economics · Framing (construction · Managerialism · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Education Systems and Policy · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development · Marketing

  • Assembling desire. Analyzing the rollout of self-tracking devices in early childhood education

    Open Access•A Paakkari, Anna Siippainen•Learning Media and Technology•2025

  • Towards evaluating the impact of employment-based programs in Australian initial teacher education

    Open Access•Claire Wyatt‐smith, Lois Harris•Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher…•2026

  • Grant chaser and revenue raiser

    Open Access•Emma Rowe, Elisa Di Gregorio•The Australian Educational…•2025

  • Fossil fuel interests, climate obstructionism, and higher education policy

    Open Access•Andrew Deuchar, Marcia Mckenzie•The Journal of Environmental…•2025

  • Education governance, philanthropy and knowledge brokering

    Open Access•Sofia Viseu, Eduardo Monteiro Martins et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Initial teacher education is not the problem

    Open Access•M James, Megan Schroder et al.•Discourse Studies in the Cultural…•2025

  • Mapping Corporate Education Reform

    Diego id_orcid Santori, Stephen John Ball et al.•Mapping Corporate Education Reform•2015

  • Education plc

    Stephen Ball, Stephen J Ball•Education Plc•2007

  • Edu.net

    Stephen Ball, Stephen J Ball et al.•Edu. net•2017

  • The Politics of Venture Philanthropy in Charter School Policy and Advocacy

    Open Access•Janelle Scott•Educational Policy•2009

  • The Hub and the Spokes

    Open Access•Janelle Scott, Huriya Jabbar•Educational Policy•2014

  • The assemblage of inanimate objects in educational research

    Open Access•Emma Rowe•International Journal of…•2022

  • Boundary spanners, network capital and the rise of edu-businesses

    Anne Hogan•Critical Studies in Education•2014

  • Mapping new philanthropy and the heterarchical state

    Open Access•Marina Avelar, Stephen Ball•International Journal of…•2017

  • Differential citizenship in the shadow state

    Open Access•Robert W Lake, Kathe Newman•GeoJournal•2002

  • Does school socioeconomic composition matter more in some countries than others, and if so, why

    Michael Sciffer, Laurens B Perry et al.•Comparative Education•2021

  • A critical policy analysis of ‘Teach for Bangladesh’

    Rino Wiseman Adhikary, Bob Lingard•Comparative Education•2017

  • The ‘will to give’

    Darren Powell•Journal of Education Policy•2019

  • Networks in action

    Eneida Oto Shiroma•Journal of Education Policy•2014

  • China’s education policy-making

    Shuangmiao Han, Fugui Ye•Journal of Education Policy•2017

  • Shit shows’ or ‘like-minded schools’

    Elisabeth E Lefebvre, Élisabeth Lefebvre et al.•Journal of Education Policy•2017

  • Venture philanthropy in public schools in Australia

    Emma Rowe•Journal of Education Policy•2023

  • Who takes initiative? The rise of education policy networks and the shifting balance of initiative-taking amongst education stakeholders in Israel

    May Amiel, Miri Yemini•Journal of Education Policy•2023

  • Policy networks and venture philanthropy

    Emma Rowe•Journal of Education Policy•2024

  • Mapping the terrain

    Kerry Kretchmar, Beth Sondel et al.•Journal of Education Policy•2014

  • The marketisation of education in Australia

    Open Access•J Chesters•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2018

  • Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks

    Open Access•Tanja A Börzel•Public Administration•1998

  • Inequalities in the private funding of public schools

    Emma Rowe, Laurens B Perry•Journal of Educational…•2019

  • Winners take all

    Open Access•Adfer Rashid Shah, Abdur Rehman Shah•International Affairs•2019

  • Pisa 2018 Results (Volume V)

    Oecd, OECD OECD•Pisa 2018 Results (Volume V)•2020

  • Le philanthrocapitalisme et les « crimes des dominants

    Linsey Mcgoey, Darren Thiel et al.•Politix•2018

Unique citing works6
Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae