Privatising public schools via product pipelines
Teach For Australia, policy networks and profit
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11487569 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emma Rowe (0000-0002-3747-8070, Deakin University, corresponding author), Sarah Langman (0000-0002-4175-1367, Institute for Learning Sciences & Teacher Education (ILSTE), Australian Catholic University, East Melbourne, Australia), Christopher Lubienski (0000-0001-7372-5801, Indiana University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 384-409 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Education Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0268-0939 • E-ISSN: 1464-5106 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02680939.2023.2266431 |
| OpenAlex | W4387460910 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 38 |
Drawing upon a long-term study of venture philanthropy and public schools in Australia, this paper focuses on Teach For Australia (TFA) as a major component of a venture philanthropic network, one that builds critical infrastructures and connections between non-government organisations and the state, creating a product pipeline into public schools. Utilising interviews with staff from Teach For Australia and venture philanthropic organisations, comprehensive and rigorous financial data, reviews, reports and website data, the analysis aims to identify the major philanthropic funders, individual actors and private foundations that leverage Teach For Australia, illustrating how this network develops for-profit pathways into public schools. In pushing a deficit framing of public schools, these networks incur privatisation effects, including flows of money, resources and key decision-making. They compromise the democratic principles upon which public schools are ideally based, in that the most disadvantaged public schools are opened up to 'entrepreneurial' and risk-taking corporate behaviour to test out teachers, products and services. By examining streams of revenue, partnerships and networks, we show how the purportedly non-profit Teach For Australia develops for-profit opportunities and business partnerships nested in corporate philanthropy, resulting in a privatisation effect on public schools
Business · Compromise · Disadvantaged · Economic growth · Economics · Framing (construction · Managerialism · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Education Systems and Policy · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development · Marketing
Assembling desire. Analyzing the rollout of self-tracking devices in early childhood education
Towards evaluating the impact of employment-based programs in Australian initial teacher education
Grant chaser and revenue raiser
Fossil fuel interests, climate obstructionism, and higher education policy
Education governance, philanthropy and knowledge brokering
Initial teacher education is not the problem
Mapping Corporate Education Reform
Education plc
Edu.net
The Politics of Venture Philanthropy in Charter School Policy and Advocacy
The Hub and the Spokes
The assemblage of inanimate objects in educational research
Boundary spanners, network capital and the rise of edu-businesses
Mapping new philanthropy and the heterarchical state
Differential citizenship in the shadow state
Does school socioeconomic composition matter more in some countries than others, and if so, why
A critical policy analysis of ‘Teach for Bangladesh’
The ‘will to give’
Networks in action
China’s education policy-making
Shit shows’ or ‘like-minded schools’
Venture philanthropy in public schools in Australia
Who takes initiative? The rise of education policy networks and the shifting balance of initiative-taking amongst education stakeholders in Israel
Policy networks and venture philanthropy
Mapping the terrain
The marketisation of education in Australia
Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks
Inequalities in the private funding of public schools
Winners take all
Pisa 2018 Results (Volume V)
Le philanthrocapitalisme et les « crimes des dominants
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |