Government stewardship of the for-profit private health sector in Afghanistan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11490226 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harry E Cro (0000-0002-2673-6847, Futures Group (United States), corresponding author), Harry E Cross, Omarzaman Sayedi (Futures Group (United States)), Laili Irani (0000-0002-5472-507X, Population Reference Bureau), Lauren C Archer (Futures Group (United States)), Kathleen Sears (Futures Group (United States)), Suneeta Sharma (Futures Group (United States)) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | czw130 |
| Publication date | 2016-09-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Policy and Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/heapol/czw130 |
| PMID | 27683341 |
| OpenAlex | W2526564438 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 7 |
BACKGROUND: Since 2003, Afghanistan's largely unregulated for-profit private health sector has grown at a rapid pace. In 2008, the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) launched a long-term stewardship initiative to oversee and regulate private providers and align the sector with national health goals. AIM: We examine the progress the MoPH has made towards more effective stewardship, consider the challenges and assess the early impacts on for-profit performance. METHODS: We reviewed publicly available documents, publications and the grey literature to analyse the development, adoption and implementation of strategies, policies and regulations. We carried out a series of key informant/participant interviews, organizational capacity assessments and analyses of hospital standards checklists. Using a literature review of health systems strengthening, we proposed an Afghan-specific definition of six key stewardship functions to assess progress towards MoPH stewardship objectives. RESULTS: The MoPH and its partners have achieved positive results in strengthening its private sector stewardship functions especially in generating actionable intelligence and establishing strategic policy directions, administrative structures and a legal and regulatory framework. Progress has also been made on improving accountability and transparency, building partnerships and applying minimum required standards to private hospitals. Procedural and operational issues still need resolution and the MoPH is establishing mechanisms for resolving them. CONCLUSIONS: The MoPH stewardship initiative is notable for its achievements to date under challenging circumstances. Its success is due to the focus on developing a solid policy framework and building institutions and systems aimed at ensuring higher quality private services, and a rational long-term and sustainable role for the private sector. Although the MoPH stewardship initiative is still at an early stage, the evidence suggests that enhanced stewardship functions in the MoPH are leading to a more efficient and effective for-profit private sector. These successful early efforts offer high-leverage potential to rapidly scale up going forward.
Accountability · Business · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental resource management · Government (linguistics) · Political science · Private sector · Public sector · Stewardship (theology) · Transparency (behavior) · Finance · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
Approaches, enablers and barriers to govern the private sector in health in low- and middle-income countries
Assessing the role of non-state actors in health service delivery and health system resilience in Myanmar
Contents of antenatal care services in Afghanistan
Is contributory health insurance indeed an addiction to a bad idea? A comment on its relevance for low- and middle-income countries
Assessing the health workforce in Afghanistan
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |