Surgical and anaesthetic capacity of hospitals in Malawi
Key insights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11490655 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jaymie Ang Henry, Jaymie Claire Ang Henry (0000-0003-3331-8704, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, corresponding author), Erica Frenkel (Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital), Eric Borgstein (0000-0001-6491-5152, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital), Nyengo Mkandawire (0000-0002-1357-8173, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital), Cyril Goddia |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 985-994 |
| Publication date | 2015-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Policy and Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/heapol/czu102 |
| PMID | 25261799 |
| OpenAlex | W2167434885 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 17 |
BACKGROUND: Surgery is increasingly recognized as an important driver for health systems strengthening, especially in developing countries. To facilitate quality improvement initiatives, baseline knowledge of capacity for surgical, anaesthetic, emergency and obstetric care is critical. In partnership with the Malawi Ministry of Health, we quantified government hospitals' surgical capacity through workforce, infrastructure and health service delivery components. METHODS: From November 2012 to January 2013, we surveyed district and mission hospital administrators and clinical staff onsite using a modified version of the Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment and Supplies (PIPES) tool from Surgeons OverSeas. We calculated percentage of facilities demonstrating adequacy of the assessed components, surgical case rates, operating theatre density and surgical workforce density. RESULTS: Twenty-seven government hospitals were surveyed (90% of the district hospitals, all central hospitals). Of the surgical workforce surveyed (n = 370), 92.7% were non-surgeons and 77% were clinical officers (COs). Of the 109 anaesthesia providers, 95.4% were non-physician anaesthetists (anaesthesia COs or ACOs). Non-surgeons and ACOs were the only providers of surgical services and anaesthetic services in 85% and 88.9% of hospitals, respectively. No specialists served the district hospitals. All of the hospitals experienced periods without external electricity. Most did not always have a functioning generator (78.3% district, 25% central) or running water (82.6%, 50%). None of the district hospitals had an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Cricothyroidotomy, bowel resection and cholecystectomy were not done in over two-thirds of hospitals. Every hospital provided general anaesthesia but some did not always have a functioning anaesthesia machine (52.2%, 50%). Surgical rate, operating theatre density and surgical workforce density per 100 000 population was 289.48-747.38 procedures, 0.98 and 5.41 and 3.68 surgical providers, respectively. CONCLUSION: COs form the backbone of Malawi's surgical and anaesthetic workforce and should be supported with improvements in infrastructure as well as training and mentorship by specialist surgeons and anaesthetists.
Government (linguistics) · Health care · Medical emergency · Workforce · Global Health and Surgery · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization · Medicine · Nursing
Monitoring and evaluation strategies for surgical task-shifting and task-sharing interventions
Global burden of plastic-surgery-related conditions, 1990–2021
Medical specialists in LMICs
The effect of deploying non-physician anaesthesia providers on surgical access and capacity across Nepal’s primary and secondary government hospitals
Health systems strengthening through surgical and perioperative care pathways
Establishing an Anaesthesia and Intensive Care partnership and aiming for national impact in Tanzania
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |