Utilization of inpatient care from private hospitals
Trends emerging from Kerala, India
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11491997 |
|---|---|
| Authors | T R Dilip (0000-0003-0916-2383, Centre For Development Studies, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 437-446 |
| Publication date | 2010-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Policy and Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/heapol/czq012 |
| PMID | 20350934 |
| OpenAlex | W2107174583 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 8 |
BACKGROUND: There is a gap in knowledge on the overall role and characteristics of private health care providers in India. This research is aimed at understanding changes in the consumption of inpatient care services from private hospitals between 1986 and 2004, with a particular focus on equitable outreach. METHODS: Secondary analysis of National Sample Survey data on the utilization of inpatient care services in Kerala is performed for the periods 1986-87, 1995-96 and 2004. Household survey data are examined to understand the users of the private health system as there are limitations in obtaining reliable data from unregulated private health care providers. FINDING: The annual hospitalization rate increased from 69 per 1000 population in 1986-87 to 126 per 1000 population by 2004. The proportion of persons seeking care from private rather than government hospitals increased from 55% in 1986-87 to 65% by 2004. Concentration indices revealed that the year 1995-96 witnessed the highest income inequality in hospitalization rates. A decline both in hospitalization rates and in the relative preference for private hospitals over government hospitals among the poorest two quintiles between 1986-87 and 1995-96 indicates that the poor avoided inpatient treatment. The rich-poor divide in care seeking from private hospitals was moderated by 2004. CONCLUSION: Improvements in the purchasing power of the population, and the strategy of private hospitals in this highly competitive market to generate revenue from the poorer quintiles by offering different pricing options, have reduced the observed rich-poor divide in the consumption of inpatient treatment from this sector. However, while this gap in utilization has closed, the burden of out-of-pocket expenditure is higher among the poor.
Business · Consumption (sociology) · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Government (linguistics) · Health care · Inpatient care · Outreach · Population · Private sector · Purchasing power · Revenue · Survey sampling · Finance · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine · Social and Economic Development in India
International Remittances and Private Healthcare in Kerala, India
Pathways to catastrophic health expenditure for acute coronary syndrome in Kerala
The Burden of Maternal Health Care Expenditure in India
Reproductive tract infections
Multivariate decomposition of shift toward public facilities for inpatient care in rural India
Understanding equity of institutional delivery in public health centre by level of care in India
Magnitude and determinants of multimorbidity and health care utilization among patients attending public versus private primary care
Market strategies used by private hospital providers to consolidate and increase power; a systematic scoping review and evaluative synthesis
Emerging Patterns of Morbidity and Hospitalization— A Comparison of Kerala and Bihar
Inpatient care of the elderly in Brazil and India
Socioeconomic inequalities in health
Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India
Historical analysis of the development of health care facilities in Kerala State, India
Rethinking health care systems
Behaviour of the private sector in the health market of Bombay
Which policy for caesarian sections in Brazil? An analysis of trends and consequences
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.71 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |