Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rural politics in transitional China

Urban–rural disparity, national integration, and grassroots democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID11496117
AuthorsZhenhua Huang (0000-0001-5990-8425, Institute for China Rural Studies, Central China Normal University, China, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume35
Issue5
Pages494-504
Publication date2020-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-5809 • E-ISSN: 1461-7242
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0268580920957914
OpenAlexW3111757900
LanguageEN

This essay reviews three books by Xu Yong that examine three critical historical processes of political transformation in rural China: the politicization of society due to urban–rural disparity, the government’s efforts to encourage political integration in rural areas, and the development of rural grassroots democracy. Urban–rural disparity has been a structural characteristic of China’s politicized society since the establishment of the monarchy. The analysis of this inequality focuses on uncovering grassroots society (as opposed to Chinese society’s upper echelons) and examining its evolutionary logic. Since 1949, China has faced the historical task of building a modern state. The government aggressively entered the countryside through large-scale political mobilization and social integration with the Chinese Communist Party as the driving force. The goal was to create a strongly integrated communist nation. Since the 1980s, the Chinese countryside has not only experienced economic liberalization but also received an opportunity for political democratization through the creation and practice of village autonomy. Self-government in autonomous villages has provided Chinese peasants with a wide range of democratic rights. In addition, calls for transformation and promotion of the democratic paradigm have increased. Xu’s three books effectively present many critical aspects of China’s rural political transformations. However, questions remain concerning the consistency of the theory and the accuracy of the analysis, which leaves room for further research and discussion

China · Civil society · Communism · Democracy · Democratization · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Government (linguistics · Grassroots · Marketization · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rural area · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · Public Administration

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae