Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Factor Structure of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Long Form‐3)

Bibliographic Data

ID11509855
AuthorsOzgur Yalcin (0000-0002-1116-5172, Murdoch University, corresponding author), Christopher Lee (0000-0002-2214-0376, Murdoch University), Christopher W Lee (0000-0001-8902-9480, Murdoch University), Helen Correia (0000-0003-2717-2294, Murdoch University)
Year2020
Volume55
Issue5
Pages546-558
Publication date2020-03-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0005-0067 • E-ISSN: 1742-9544
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ap.12458
OpenAlexW3009665889
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited31

Objective \nThe aim of this study was to assess the factor structure of the English version of the Young Schema Questionnaire Long Form‐3 (YSQ‐L3) using a large clinical sample and smaller non‐clinical population. The items in the YSQ‐L3 were evaluated as to how well they assess the underlying theoretical constructs of schema and schema domains. \n \nMethod \nA primary and a higher order factor (HOF) analysis was undertaken on a large heterogeneous clinical sample (N = 574) and the total sample (N = 838) that included a small non‐clinical population (N = 264). \n \nResults \nThe primary factor analysis revealed 20 early maladaptive schemas (EMS). Of the 232 items, 182 loaded above .4 and were retained for the final analysis. The original Emotional Inhibition schema separated into Emotional Constriction and Fear of Losing Control, and Punitiveness likewise separated into Punitiveness (Self) and Punitiveness (Other). The HOF analysis indicated four domains: Emotional Dysregulation, Disconnection, Impaired Autonomy/Underdeveloped Self, and Excessive Responsibility/Overcontrol. These overlap with the domains proposed by Young et al. (2003) but with some differences. The Emotion Dysregulation domain was unique to the current study. The mean item loading for each factor ranged from .52 to .82. The revised scale showed excellent overall internal consistency (a = .91). \n \nConclusion \nThis is the first study that investigated the psychometric properties of the English version of the YSQ‐L3. The resultant domains fitted with existing literature of meaningful clinical phenomenon such as attachment and emotion dysregulation and their role in maintaining chronic psychological disorders

Confirmatory factor analysis · Developmental psychology · Disconnection · Emotional dysregulation · Population · Schema (genetic algorithms · Structural equation modeling · Young adult · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

  • A new model for basic needs

    Open Access•Hasan Alp Karaosmanoğlu, Bahar Köse Karaca et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • Adaptive Schema Domains

    Jakke Coenye, Sandra Verbeken et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2025

  • The prevalence of early maladaptive schemas, anxiety, and coping strategies in adolescent girls who are survivors of sexual abuse

    Soufiane Adnani, Ouahidi Moulay Laarbi et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • The role of enmeshment and undeveloped self, subjugation and self-sacrifice in childhood trauma and attachment related problems

    Open Access•Cristina Maria Clementina Baroncelli, Paul Lodder et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Experiences of victimization, maladaptive schemas, and the mediating role of resilience in adolescents

    Open Access•Vanessa Caba-Machado, Raquel Escortell et al.•BMC Psychology•2026

  • Early maladaptive schemas, coping strategies, and functional impairments in individuals with adjustment disorder during compulsory military service

    Open Access•Tarık Sağlam•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2025

  • The YSQ-R

    Open Access•Ozgur Yalcin, Ida Marais et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Recollections of Parental Mental Illness and Substance Use and Early Maladaptive Schemas in Adulthood

    Open Access•Pamela D Pilkington, Tamara May et al.•International Journal of Mental…•2022

  • Revisions to the Young Schema Questionnaire using Rasch analysis

    Ozgur Yalcin, Ida Marais et al.•Australian Psychologist•2021

  • Cognitive distortions mediate relationships between early maladaptive schemas and aggression in women and men

    Open Access•Li Shaun Huang, Pascal Molenberghs et al.•Aggressive Behavior•2023

  • Schema Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder

    Open Access•Arnoud Arntz, Hannie Van Genderen et al.•Schema Therapy for Borderline…•2020

  • Borderline personality disorder

    Open Access•Klaus Lieb, Mary C Zanarini et al.•The Lancet•2004

  • How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis

    Max Auerswald, Morten Moshagen•Psychological Methods•2019

  • Childhood Adversities and Adult Psychiatric Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication I

    Jennifer Green, Jennifer Greif Green et al.•Archives of General Psychiatry•2010

  • Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

    Open Access•Caroline B Terwee, Sandra D M Bot et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2007

  • Restoration process of the need for autonomy

    Rémi Radel, Luc G Pelletier et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2011

  • Lessons from Erikson

    Stephen B Grave, Stephen B Graves et al.•Journal of Intergenerational…•2006

Citations per year2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae