Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

A Self‐Report Survey

Australian Clinicians’ Attitudes Towards Progress Monitoring Measures

Dados Bibliográficos

ID11510356
AutoresJennifer Chung (0000-0003-0770-2884, Monash University, autor correspondente), Ben Buchanan (0000-0002-2456-7795, Monash University)
Ano2018
Volume54
Fascículo1
Páginas3-12
Data de publicação2018-07-12
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAustralian Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0005-0067 • E-ISSN: 1742-9544
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ap.12352
OpenAlexW2872890243
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas37

ObjectiveResearch supports an association between regularly administering standardised measures to assess client progress (progress monitoring) and improved treatment outcomes. However, some research suggests clinicians often rely heavily and solely on clinical judgement when making treatment decisions. This study was the first to explore psychologists’ implementation of progress monitoring, within an Australian clinical context.MethodA self‐report survey investigated Australian psychologists’ (N = 208; gender and age proportional to national representation) attitude, awareness, use, motives, and barriers towards implementing standardised assessment and progress monitoring. The survey comprised of the Attitudes towards Standardised Assessment Scales, and existing literature on progress monitoring implementation.ResultsNinety‐eight per cent of psychologists were aware of progress monitoring measures, and 69% reported using them in practice. Majority of progress monitoring users rated these measures as very useful (51%) and over one third (39%) used them with most of their clients. Contrary to the hypothesis, a t‐test demonstrated that attitude towards standardised assessment did not differ between progress monitoring users and non‐users. Among the clinicians who have not implemented progress monitoring, time barriers were rated as most important.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that although awareness of progress monitoring may be widely known, perceived barriers may outweigh the potential benefits for some. It is also concluded that further qualitative research is needed to adequately understand these barriers and their importance. Future interventions may then promote evidence‐based recommendations and focus on the practicality, utility, and workflow difficulties associated with incorporating progress monitoring

Context (archaeology · Judgement · Monitoring and evaluation · Political science · Psychological intervention · Self-monitoring · Applied Psychology · Medicine · Nursing · Psychiatric care and mental health services · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Social Psychology

  • Empowering the voices and agency of Indigenous Australian youth and their wellbeing in higher education✰

    Open Access•Georgia Durmush, Rhonda G Craven et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Evidence-based practice in psychology.

    American Psychological Association•American Psychologist•2006

  • Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework

    Open Access•Alison L Kitson, Jo Rycroft‐malone et al.•Implementation Science•2008

  • The Theory of Planned Behavior

    Open Access•Gabriel Godin, Gaston Godin et al.•American Journal of Health…•1996

  • Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour

    Open Access•Christopher J Armitage, Mycah Conner et al.•British Journal of Social…•2001

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • An Investigation of Self-Assessment Bias in Mental Health Providers

    Open Access•Steven Walfish, Brian McAlister et al.•Psychological Reports•2012

  • Using information about patient progress in supervision

    Open Access•Michael J Lambert, Eric J Hawkins•Australian Psychologist•2001

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,2
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2021 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae