Reliability of repeated cognitive testing in healthy Indigenous Australian adolescents

Bibliographic Data

ID11510596
AuthorsKylie Dingwall (0000-0002-7841-4751, Charles Darwin University, corresponding author), Kylie M Dingwall (Menzies School of Health Research, Institute of Advanced Studies, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory), Matthew Lewis (0000-0003-3891-4169, Menzies School of Health Research), Matthew S Lewis (0000-0002-2211-6595, Menzies School of Health Research, Institute of Advanced Studies, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory), Paul Maruff (0000-0002-6947-9537, The University of Melbourne), Sheree Cairney (0000-0002-3771-5443, Menzies School of Health Research, Institute of Advanced Studies, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory)
Year2009
Volume44
Issue4
Pages224-234
Publication date2009-09-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0005-0067 • E-ISSN: 1742-9544
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00050060903136839
OpenAlexW1991179660
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited46

Serial assessment is required in situations where decline or recovery of function is anticipated. Serial assessment of cognition in Indigenous populations, however, can be problematic due to a lack of culturally appropriate assessments with psychometric properties suitable for repeated administration. This study assessed a non-verbal, culturally neutral, computerised cognitive test battery for its test–retest reliability and any practice effects in a sample of 40 healthy Indigenous adolescents (mean age = 15.25 years). No practice effects and adequate retest reliabilities were recorded for both accuracy and speed on tests of psychomotor function, visual attention and working memory (i.e. card tasks). A lack of practice effects and adequate reliabilities were also observed for accuracy (but not speed) on the more complex learning and memory tasks (i.e. non-card tasks). Interestingly, this outcome contrasts with those of similar studies in which the performance of non-Indigenous people on the same tasks showed speed to be a more reliable measure than accuracy, and this may reflect different perceptions of time between these groups. Among Indigenous adolescents, this study demonstrates acceptable reliability and stability of the selected cognitive assessment process, providing validity for its use as a research and screening tool in this population

Audiology · Cognition · Cognitive test · Developmental psychology · Indigenous · Population · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Psychomotor learning · Reliability (semiconductor · Test (biology · Clinical Psychology · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Infant Development and Preterm Care · Medicine · Psychology