Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Reply to William Leiss, “Technological Rationality

Notes on ‘Work and Freedom in Marcuse and Marx’”

Bibliographic Data

ID11522497
AuthorsEdward Andrew (University of Toronto, corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume4
Issue3
Pages400-404
Publication date1971-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s000842390002686x
OpenAlexW2039012357
LanguageEN

Mr Leiss has taken exception to my contention that Marcuse espouses the doctrine of technological rationality whereas Marx does not. He asserts that a re-examination of the original sources will not support such a classification. Since Mr Leiss does not. provide any sources or reasons to indicate why he disagrees with my assertion that Marx was not an adherent of technological rationality, I shall briefly recapitulate the reasons for my assertion and then pass on to his primary concern, namely, that I failed to support my view that Marcuse believes technological progress towards automation is the embodiment of reason in history

Assertion · Doctrine · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · Rationality · Sociology · Technological change · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Humanities and Social Sciences · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae