A Reply to William Leiss, “Technological Rationality
Notes on ‘Work and Freedom in Marcuse and Marx’”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11522497 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Edward Andrew (University of Toronto, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1971 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 400-404 |
| Publication date | 1971-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s000842390002686x |
| OpenAlex | W2039012357 |
| Language | EN |
Mr Leiss has taken exception to my contention that Marcuse espouses the doctrine of technological rationality whereas Marx does not. He asserts that a re-examination of the original sources will not support such a classification. Since Mr Leiss does not. provide any sources or reasons to indicate why he disagrees with my assertion that Marx was not an adherent of technological rationality, I shall briefly recapitulate the reasons for my assertion and then pass on to his primary concern, namely, that I failed to support my view that Marcuse believes technological progress towards automation is the embodiment of reason in history
Assertion · Doctrine · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · Rationality · Sociology · Technological change · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Humanities and Social Sciences · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |