Standards of judicial review of administrative bodies
The consideration of citizen participation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11524726 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Edward Taucar (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 67-86 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00112.x |
| OpenAlex | W2102413032 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
In Canada there is little legitimate or legal room or consistency with the judicial role in judicial review of or appeal from administrative actions or decisions for courts to take into account the degree or quality of citizen participation to support greater deference for administrative decision or action. At most, this consideration may be considered a sub‐factor, marginal and never determinative. In particular, citizen participation can be a sub‐factor when the public perception is either explicitly central to the legislation in issue, or is assumed or inferred as such by the court. Nevertheless, assuming such citizen participation in bureaucracy is positive, there can be some significant indirect coincidental promotion of it in reality as a result of and through judicial deference to administrative decisions, which occurs concomitantly in standard‐of‐review analysis
Appeal · Bureaucracy · Consistency (knowledge bases · Deference · Judicial deference · Judicial opinion · Judicial review · Law and economics · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Public participation · Quality (philosophy · Sociology · Standard of review · Criminal Law and Evidence · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |