Astronomical Comments on Dr. Holmes's Note on the Julian Calendar
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11525073 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J K Fotheringham (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1920 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 97-99 |
| Publication date | 1920-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Classical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-8388 • E-ISSN: 1471-6844 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009838800017778 |
| OpenAlex | W2912734249 |
| Language | EN |
While reserving my judgment on the wider questions connected with the Roman calendar, I think it may not be out of place to attempt a firmer handling of the astronomical dates discussed in Dr. Rice Holmes's ‘Supplementary Note on the Julian Calendar’ which appeared in the Classical Quarterly, XIV. (1920), pp. 46, 47. That note is concerned with two new moons discussed by Dr. Groebe in his edition of Drumann's Geschichte Roms , III. (1906), pp. 774–9
Art history · Classics · Historical and Architectural Studies · Historical Astronomy and Related Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|