Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Argumentation and debate in Chinese

A reply to Becker

Bibliographic Data

ID11526697
AuthorsP G Edwards (0000-0002-8186-4753, Monash University, corresponding author), Philip Edwards (Monash University), Lu Sheng (0000-0003-4896-0724, b Suzhou University), Sheng Lu (0000-0003-4577-9022, Soochow University), Xu Qing‐gen (c Suzhou University)
Year1994
Volume26
Issue2
Pages51-66
Publication date1994-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Philosophy and Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-1857 • E-ISSN: 1469-5812
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1469-5812.1994.tb00206.x
OpenAlexW2001660471
LanguageEN
References cited3

(1994). Argumentation and debate in Chinese: A reply to Becker. Educational Philosophy and Theory: Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 51-66

Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Higher education · Philosophy of education · Political science · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · Cultural Differences and Values · Law · Philosophy · Social Representations and Identity

  • The Great Chinese Revolution, 1800-1985

    James E Sheridan, John King Fairbank et al.•The American Historical Review•1988

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    I M D Little•Journal of Political Economy•1952

  • "Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and "Truth

    Open Access•Chad Hansen•The Journal of Asian Studies•1985

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae