Discretion of public appointments in Mexico
A review of organizational arrangements in subnational appointments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11557014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristian González (0000-0001-9975-5267, University of Erfurt, corresponding author), Calep Pimienta Gonzalez (0009-0004-3131-0682, University of Erfurt) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 579-597 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of Administrative Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8523 • E-ISSN: 1461-7226 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00208523251358592 |
| OpenAlex | W4414856698 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
Public appointments (PAs) are tools with the potential to transform and legitimize institutions. They can promote governance based on integrity and fairness yet may be subject to patronage due to high discretion vested in appointing authorities. The literature on this topic in Latin America is limited, with little focus on the subnational level. Democratic theories assessing appointment effects on legitimacy and trust in public institutions are lacking. Recent research has deepened the effect of organizational arrangements (OAs) as key procedural mechanisms to constrain discretion. However, their measurement remains unresolved. This study develops an instrument to measure the quality of OAs in PAs called the Evaluation System of Organizational Arrangements, aiming to understand the influence of OAs on the perceived outcome of 24 subnational PAs in Mexico. A documentary review of official documentation and cross-case analysis showed that the inexistence or low quality of OAs increases PAs’ discretionality, affecting governance perception and leading to patronage or hybrid outcomes. Local stakeholder engagement and digital innovation were the most relevant factors influencing perceived outcomes, followed by transparency and independent scrutiny. The analysis of perceived outcomes allowed us to characterize governance, hybrid and patronage appointments. These findings open new research pathways on the specific conditions that enable governance PAs
Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Los intelectuales y el poder en México
E-Government and Anti-Corruption
Courts and the judicial erosion of democracy in Latin America
Thematic Review
The Institutionalization of Political Discretion in Post‐communist Civil Service Systems
Political Recruitment Beyond Elections
Addressing fragmented government action
Between patronage and good governance
Checks, Balances, and Appointments in the Public Service
Are Public Bodies Still ‘Male, Pale and Stale’? Examining Diversity in UK Public Appointments 1997–2010
Patronage in British Government
The Consequences of Presidential Patronage for Federal Agency Performance
The Politics of Patronage in the United Kingdom
Party patronage in contemporary democracies
How Patronage Delivers
Political Appointments, Civil Service Systems, and Bureaucratic Competence
The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy
Corrupción y legitimidad democrática en México
La tecnocracia en México
Patrons and Clients in the Bureaucracy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |