Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sense and nonsense in hierarchical regression analysis

Comment on Smyth

Bibliographic Data

ID11562425
AuthorsElazar J Pedhazur (corresponding author)
Year1984
Volume46
Issue2
Pages479-482
Publication date1984-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.479
OpenAlexW1969462188
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited5

Hierarchical multiple regression analysis is popular among social scientists. Regrettably,, however, one often encounters the use of hierarchical analysis with what appear to be utter disregard of its requirements and lack of understanding of the nature of the answers it provides (for extensive discussions, see Cohen & Cohen, 1975; Pedhazur, 1982). The purpose of this comment is to discuss incorrect applications of hierarchical analyses in an article by Smyth (1982) published in this journal. It should be noted that the comment is addressed exclusively to this aspect of Smyth's article. Specifically, it deals with the first two paragraphs of his Results section and with his Table 1 (Smyth, 1982, pp. 558-559). Smyth (1982) stated that he resorted to hierarchical regression analysis since analyses of covariance (ANCOVAS) would ignore the possibility of the covariate (neuroticism) interacting with the experimental manipulations (p. 558). Anyone familiar with presentations of conventional (e.g., Edwards, 1972; Kirk, 1968; Winer, 1971) cannot but be puzzled by Smyth's statement, because such presentations underscore the importance of testing whether the covariate interacts with the treatments (i.e., homogeneity of within-groups regression coefficients) as a prerequisite for tests among adjusted means. Although it is true that ANCOVA can be more efficiently accomplished via hierarchical regression analysis (see Cohen & Cohen, 1975; Pedhazur, 1982), the hypotheses tested and

Multilevel model · Nonsense · Psychoanalysis · Regression · Regression analysis · Statistics · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Raw Score and Factor Score Multiple Regression

    Open Access•Tam Dobie, Ken McFarland et al.•Educational and Psychological…•1986

  • Relation of hassles and personality to subjective well-being

    Sheryl Zika, Kerry Chamberlain•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Effects of motive-goal congruence on well-being in the power domain

    Open Access•Jan Hofer, Holger Busch et al.•Journal of Research in Personality•2010

  • Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences

    Roger E Kirk, Roger Kirk•Experimental Design•2013

  • Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen, Patricia Cohen et al.•Applied Multiple Regression/Correla…•2014

  • Statistical principles in experimental design.

    B J Winer•1962

  • Psychopathology as a function of neuroticism and a hypnotically implanted aggressive conflict

    Larry D Smyth•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

  • Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1978

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,07
Citation span1986 - 2010 (25)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae