A Participant's View of the National Council of Women Psychologists
Comment on Capshew and Laszlo
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11563281 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alice I Bryan (Columbia University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 181-184 |
| Publication date | 1986-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-4537 • E-ISSN: 1540-4560 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00214.x |
| OpenAlex | W2080139672 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 3 |
In their perceptive and closely reasoned attempt to delineate “the complex relationships between gender, professionalization, and ideology” that evolved within the American psychological profession during World War II and to “further expose the processes that produce and legitimate separate spheres of activity for men and women,” Capshew and Laszlo (1986) provide a fresh, thought‐provoking perspective from which to view “the woman problem,” as it was initially dubbed by E. G. Boring (1951). They present data drawn from historical, statistical, and autobiographical sources, assess the relative influence of possible causal factors, and draw conclusions consonant with their basic assumptions
Art · Epistemology · Ideology · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Professionalization · Psychoanalysis · Social science · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2017 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |