Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Firth's early phonological views and prosodic analysis

A reply to Coleman (2004)

Bibliographic Data

ID11565274
AuthorsElena Battaner Moro (0000-0002-5521-6445, Universidad de la Comunicación, corresponding author), Elena Battaner-Moro
Year2006
Volume36
Issue1
Pages97-102
Publication date2006-05-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the International Phonetic Association (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-1003 • E-ISSN: 1475-3502
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0025100306002404
OpenAlexW2092809148
LanguageEN

In a previous issue of this journal, John Coleman (2004) reviewed the written-up version of a poster I presented at the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona (Battaner-Moro 2003, henceforth BM). The aim of the poster was to discuss the evolution of Firthian prosodic analysis. In his review, Coleman derives from it ‘an ignorance or a neglect of Firth's publications prior to 1948' on my part (p. 211). He focusses his criticisms on the following three statements: ‘Firth never did prosodic analysis.’ ‘There is a complete absence of programmatic work in Firth's works.’ ‘Prosodic analysis was developed by the members of the London School and not at all by John Firth.’

Epistemology · Firth · Ignorance · Linguistics · Neglect · Geology · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae