Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Degrees of Separation in the Phaedo

Bibliographic Data

ID11585145
AuthorsMichael Pakaluk (0000-0001-5174-602X, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume48
Issue2
Pages89-115
Publication date2003-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhronesis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8868 • E-ISSN: 1568-5284
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/156852803322145573
OpenAlexW2020200285
LanguageEN
Citations received7

It can be shown that, if we assume 'substance dualism', or the real distinctness of the soul from the body, then the standard objections to the Cyclical Argument in the Phaedo fail. So charity would presumably require that we take substance dualism to be presupposed by that argument. To do so would not beg any question, since substance dualism is a significantly weaker thesis than the immortality of the soul. Moreover, there is good textual evidence in favor of this presumption. A closer look at the immediately preceding passage, viz. "Socrates' Defense", reveals an argument for a real distinction between soul and body, not unlike Descartes' famous argument, based on the identification of an activity in which the soul can in principle engage on its own, without assistance from the body. The argumentative project of the Phaedo, on this reading, becomes: given that the soul is really distinct, show that it is immortal. And Plato aims to do this in two stages. The three initial arguments are meant to establish merely the minimal claim that the continued existence of the soul across cycles of reincarnation is the most plausible view to take, given substance dualism; and it is left to the Final Argument to argue for something that we might regard as immortality, that is, the imperishability of the soul, come what may

Ancient philosophy · Argument (complex analysis · Dualism · Epistemology · Immortality · Mind–body problem · SOCRATES · Soul · Theology · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • The Method of Hypothesis and the Nature of Soul in Plato's Phaedo

    Open Access•John Palmer•Method of Hypothesis and the…•2021

  • Eschatology and the Limits of Philosophy in the Phaedo

    Open Access•Travis Butler•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2023

  • Temperance and Epistemic Purity in Plato’s Phaedo

    Patricia Marechal•Archiv für Geschichte der…•2023

  • Appreciative Musings on Normative Thoughts, Normative Feelings, Normative Actions

    Open Access•Michael Pakaluk, Craig Steven Titus et al.•Journal of Psychology and Theology•2009

  • The Things That Really Matter

    Open Access•Michael Hauskeller•The Things That Really Matter•2022

  • O sentido de Phrónesis e moral filosófica no Fédon

    Open Access•Sheila Paulino E Silva•Prometeus•2016

  • Deficient Virtue in the Phaedo

    Open Access•Doug Reed•The Classical Quarterly•2020

Citations per year0.41
Citation span2009 - 2023 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae