Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Place of I 7 in the Argument of Physics I

Bibliographic Data

ID11585778
AuthorsSean Kelsey (1Department of Philosophy, University of California – Los Angeles, Dodd 321, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1451, USA;, Email: [email protected], corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume53
Issue2
Pages180-208
Publication date2008-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhronesis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8868 • E-ISSN: 1568-5284
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/156852808x278721
OpenAlexW1978756150
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Aristotle introduces Physics I as an inquiry into principles; in this paper I ask where he argues for the position he reaches in I 7. Many hold that his definitive argument is found in the first half of I 7 itself; I argue that this view is mistaken: the considerations raised there do not form the basis of any self-standing argument for Aristotle's doctrine of principles, but rather play a subordinate role in a larger argument begun in earnest in I 5. This larger argument stalls in I 6, which ends in aporia; I argue that the problem lies in the fact that Aristotle's reasoning in I 6 thoroughly undermines his reasoning in I 5 (on which I 6 is ostensibly supposed to build). I further argue that the materials necessary for resolving this problem, and thereby allowing the argument begun in I 5 to reach its proper conclusion, are supplied by the thesis that organizes the first half of I 7. Along the way I offer some remarks about Aristotle's doctrine of principles, arguing that it is about the principles of natural substance (as opposed to coming to be or change). I also offer some remarks about the thesis which organizes the first half of I 7. I argue negatively that it is not anything like a preliminary statement of Aristotle's doctrine of principles. I argue positively that it reflects Aristotle's idea that there are two distinct kinds of effect change has upon things (one constructive, the other destructive). One of these effects lies behind Aristotle's reasoning in I 5, the other comes to the fore in I 6; the achievement of the first half of I 7 is to reconcile these seemingly competing conceptions by finding a place for them both in a unified account of coming to be and its subjects

Ancient philosophy · Argument (complex analysis · Constructive · Doctrine · Epistemology · Theology · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy

  • Aristotle’s Parmenidean Dilemma

    A Anagnostopoulos•Archiv für Geschichte der…•2013

Citations per year0.08
Citation span2013 - 2013 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae