Sociability and Market Making
A Response to LiPuma and Lee
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11600271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gary Herrigel (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 111 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 317-320 |
| Publication date | 2012-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | South Atlantic Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-2876 • E-ISSN: 1527-8026 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00382876-1548230 |
| OpenAlex | W2328094245 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Edward LiPuma and Benjamin Lee emphasize performativity to a fault in their characterization of action within financial markets. Though valuable, their reproduction oriented approach misses financial actors' awareness and self-conscious manipulation of sociability in the destabilizing process of market making. More recognition of complexity in financial realms can be a lever for the identification of critical alternatives for its organization
Action (physics · Business · Financial market · Identification (biology · Law and economics · Lever · Performativity · Process (computing · Sociology · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Engineering · Finance · Gender Studies
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,08 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2014 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |