Peer-reviewers and selected review statistics, 2013–2014
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11608259 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Stausberg (0000-0002-2011-6997, Schlumberger (Ireland), corresponding author), Steven Joseph Engler (0000-0001-8716-7943) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-6 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religion (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-721X • E-ISSN: 1096-1151 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0048721x.2015.1125151 |
| OpenAlex | W2297836464 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
The quality of a journal like Religion depends on the authors who submit their work and the referees who evaluate it. Peer review remains the major quality-control mechanism employed by academic jo
Epistemology · Peer review · Political science · Quality (philosophy · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Study and Philosophy of Religion
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |