A Roman Signal Station at Whitby
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11617384 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tyler Bell (0000-0001-5702-5995, corresponding author), T W Bell |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 155 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 303-322 |
| Publication date | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archaeological Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0066-5983 • E-ISSN: 2373-2288 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00665983.1998.11078853 |
| OpenAlex | W1991293280 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 13 |
The possible existence of a Roman signal station at Whitby has a significant impact upon the study of the Roman defensive system of the North Yorkshire coast and our understanding of the Anglo-Saxon ecclesiastical topography of the area. Whitby lies at the mouth of the River Esk and its associated harbour on the North Yorkshire coast, amidst an intervisible chain of five known signal stations, but is perhaps best known for its Anglo-Saxon monastery founded by the Northumbrian king Oswy in A.D. 657. No absolute archaeological evidence of a signal station at Whitby exists, but the toponym suggests that the site had an association with a signal station or watchtower. It is clear that the existing stations were designed to function as a cohesive system, given their similar form and contemporary dates: communication and intervisibility were therefore essential aspects of this defensive network. Despite this, the stations to the north and south of Whitby—those at Goldsborough and Ravenscar respectively—are not intervisible. A station positioned at Whitby would effectively close this gap in the system.Attempting to reconcile the near complete absence of archaeological remains with the place-name and geographical evidence, this paper uses geologically determined erosion rates to examine the possibility that such a station existed on the more than three hundred metres of coastal land that has eroded since the Roman period. In doing so it addresses the extent to which archaeologists can reconstruct and work with an ancient coastline on a local scale. Having established the probability of a ‘lost’ station, the paper discusses the results of a GIS viewshed application which address the feasibility of such a station's intervisibility from its neighbouring station to the south. The concluding sections investigate the stations' possible form
Ancient history · Archaeology · Geography · Harbour · SIGNAL (programming language · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Computer Science · Geology · History · Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Iron Age Settlement at Broomfield Farm, Stainsacre Lane, Whitby, North Yorkshire
Protecting the Roman Empire
The Roman fortlet or defended watch-tower/ pharos at St John the Baptist, Reedham, Norfolk and the Early Medieval origins of the church
Excavations on the Site of the Roman Signal Station At Carr Naze, Filey, 1993–94
Turrem Et Castrum ’
The Roman Signal Station at Goldsborough, Near Whitby
II.— The Saxon Monastery of Whitby
The Drusion
The Pottery from the Roman Signal-Stations on the Yorkshire Coast
The Roman Lighthouses at Dover
Notes on the Roman Coast Defences of Britain, especially in Yorkshire
Roman Britain in 1923
The Roman Fort at Huntcliff, near Saltburn
Trajan’s Army on Trajan's Column
Fortifications in the North-Western Roman Empire from the Third to the Fifth Centuries A.D
The History of Scarborough
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,19 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2024 (25) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |