Reasons, Rights, and (Mis)readings
A Response to Emden
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11623521 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Tollefsen (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 2020 |
| Issue | 193 |
| Pages | 155-164 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Telos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6514 • E-ISSN: 1940-459X |
| Publisher | Telos (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3817/1220193155 |
| OpenAlex | W3113629130 |
| Language | EN |
Christian Emden misreads the Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights, as well as my own “Further Thoughts” about that document.1 His errors reveal what I believe is one of the biggest obstacles to the success of the report, namely, the unwillingness of its pre-announced opponents to read it with a mind open to its plain sense
Commission · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|