A Generalized Framework for Moral Dilemmas Involving Autonomous Vehicles
A Commentary on Gill
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11624370 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas P Novak (Denit Trust Distinguished Scholar and Professor of Marketing at The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC 20052, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 292-300 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Consumer Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-5301 • E-ISSN: 1537-5277 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jcr/ucaa024 |
| OpenAlex | W3039314374 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 33 |
By using scenarios based on moral dilemmas, Gill (2020) found that when consumers are riding in an autonomous vehicle (AV), they are more willing to harm a pedestrian than when they, themselves, are driving a regular car. By taking a first-person perspective, in contrast to most prior research that has taken a third-person perspective, the problem is framed in a personal way that allows identification of a mechanism of responsibility attribution. In this commentary, a generalized framework is developed in which we can locate the work of Gill (2020), as well as prior research that uses moral dilemmas, to understand how consumers believe that AVs should respond when faced with competing life-and-death alternatives. The framework shows the distinct positions that research to date has adopted, points out gaps in research, and suggests a family of four research agendas that can be pursued going forward, driven in large part by the perspective taken to the moral dilemma. Research employing these different perspectives, including the unresearched problem of taking the perspective of the object, holds promise for using moral dilemmas for enabling our understanding of consumer experience and consumer–object relationships with AVs
Attribution · Dilemma · Epistemology · Harm · Moral dilemma · Moral disengagement · Moral responsibility · Object (grammar · Perspective (graphical · Social cognitive theory of morality · Sociology · Computer Science · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Alien Phenomenology, or What It's Like to Be a Thing
The Moral Machine experiment
Revisiting External Validity
The Trolley Problem
The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy
On seeing human
Interpersonal perception
Assemblage Theory
Third-Person Effect Research 1983–1992
Empathy and the self
Perspective-taking
What Does Matter? The Case for Killing the Trolley Problem (Or Letting It Die)
First-Person Shooters and the Third-Person Effect
Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things
Blame It on the Self-Driving Car
The Price of Being Beautiful
Mispredicting Others' Valuations
The Disciplinary Status of Consumer Behavior
The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation
Heart and Mind in Conflict
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |