Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Generalized Framework for Moral Dilemmas Involving Autonomous Vehicles

A Commentary on Gill

Bibliographic Data

ID11624370
AuthorsThomas P Novak (Denit Trust Distinguished Scholar and Professor of Marketing at The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC 20052, USA, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume47
Issue2
Pages292-300
Publication date2020-05-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Consumer Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-5301 • E-ISSN: 1537-5277
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jcr/ucaa024
OpenAlexW3039314374
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited33

By using scenarios based on moral dilemmas, Gill (2020) found that when consumers are riding in an autonomous vehicle (AV), they are more willing to harm a pedestrian than when they, themselves, are driving a regular car. By taking a first-person perspective, in contrast to most prior research that has taken a third-person perspective, the problem is framed in a personal way that allows identification of a mechanism of responsibility attribution. In this commentary, a generalized framework is developed in which we can locate the work of Gill (2020), as well as prior research that uses moral dilemmas, to understand how consumers believe that AVs should respond when faced with competing life-and-death alternatives. The framework shows the distinct positions that research to date has adopted, points out gaps in research, and suggests a family of four research agendas that can be pursued going forward, driven in large part by the perspective taken to the moral dilemma. Research employing these different perspectives, including the unresearched problem of taking the perspective of the object, holds promise for using moral dilemmas for enabling our understanding of consumer experience and consumer–object relationships with AVs

Attribution · Dilemma · Epistemology · Harm · Moral dilemma · Moral disengagement · Moral responsibility · Object (grammar · Perspective (graphical · Social cognitive theory of morality · Sociology · Computer Science · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Who guards the guards with AI-driven robots? The ethicalness and cognitive neutralization of police violence following AI-robot advice

    Open Access•Lisa Hohensinn, Jaap Willems et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Morality on the road

    Open Access•Peng Liu, Yueying Chu et al.•Cognition•2025

  • Applying ethical theories to the decision-making of self-driving vehicles

    Open Access•Franziska Poszler, Maximilian Geisslinger et al.•Technology in Society•2023

  • Alien Phenomenology, or What It's Like to Be a Thing

    Ian Bogost•Alien phenomenology, or, What…•2012

  • The Moral Machine experiment

    Open Access•Emmanuelle Awad, Edmond Awad et al.•Nature•2018

  • Revisiting External Validity

    Open Access•Christopher W Bauman, A Peter Mcgraw et al.•Social and Personality Psychology…•2014

  • The Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson•The Yale Law Journal•1985

  • The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy

    Open Access•Claus Lamm, Christie D Batson et al.•Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience•2007

  • On seeing human

    Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz et al.•Psychological Review•2007

  • Interpersonal perception

    R D Laing•Interpersonal perception•1999

  • Assemblage Theory

    Manuel Delanda•Assemblage Theory•2016

  • Third-Person Effect Research 1983–1992

    Richard M Perloff•International Journal of Public…•1993

  • Empathy and the self

    David A Houston•Journal of Personality and Social…•1990

  • Perspective-taking

    Adam D Galinsky, Gordon B Moskowitz•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • What Does Matter? The Case for Killing the Trolley Problem (Or Letting It Die)

    Barbara H Fried•The Philosophical Quarterly•2012

  • First-Person Shooters and the Third-Person Effect

    Open Access•Erica Scharrer, Ron Leone•Human Communication Research•2008

  • Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things

    Open Access•Donna L Hoffman, Thomas P Novak et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2018

  • Blame It on the Self-Driving Car

    Open Access•T Gill, Eileen Fischer et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2020

  • The Price of Being Beautiful

    Robert J Fisher, Yu Ma•Journal of Consumer Research•2014

  • Mispredicting Others' Valuations

    Didem Kurt, J Jeffrey Inman•Journal of Consumer Research•2013

  • The Disciplinary Status of Consumer Behavior

    Deborah J Macinnis, Valerie S Folkes•Journal of Consumer Research•2010

  • The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation

    Thomas P Novak, Donna L Hoffman•Journal of Consumer Research•2009

  • Heart and Mind in Conflict

    Baba Shiv, Alexander Fedorikhin•Journal of Consumer Research•1999

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae