Social Science for What
Battles over Public Funding for the "Other Sciences" at the National Science Foundation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11626157 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Solovey (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-07 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Social Science for What (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | The MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7551/mitpress/12211.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4251610256 |
| ISBN | 9780262358743 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
How the NSF became an important yet controversial patron for the social sciences, influencing debates over their scientific status and social relevance. In the early Cold War years, the U.S. government established the National Science Foundation (NSF), a civilian agency that soon became widely known for its dedication to supporting first-rate science. The agency's 1950 enabling legislation made no mention of the social sciences, although it included a vague reference to “other sciences.” Nevertheless, as Mark Solovey shows in this book, the NSF also soon became a major—albeit controversial—source of public funding for them. Solovey's analysis underscores the long-term impact of early developments, when the NSF embraced a “scientistic” strategy wherein the natural sciences represented the gold standard, and created a social science program limited to “hard-core” studies. Along the way, Solovey shows how the NSF's efforts to support scholarship, advanced training, and educational programs were shaped by landmark scientific and political developments, including McCarthyism, Sputnik, reform liberalism during the 1960s, and a newly energized conservative movement during the 1970s and 1980s. Finally, he assesses the NSF's relevance in a “post-truth” era, questions the legacy of its scientistic strategy, and calls for a separate social science agency—a National Social Science Foundation. Solovey's study of the battles over public funding is crucial for understanding the recent history of the social sciences as well as ongoing debates over their scientific status and social value. The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding from the MIT Libraries
Agency (philosophy · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Relevance (law · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Law · Public Administration
The Limited Role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Interdisciplinary Funding
Concept-Quake
Response to Goldstein et al. (2022) Humanitarian Action in Academic Institutions
The Role of Power in Co‐Approaches to Health Research
The Grudging Modernizer
Sociotechnical curricular approaches for a culture of engagement in engineering
The first experiment in a transnational dialog”
Cash Is Not King
Academic Fields, Funding, and Turbulent Times
The Cold War Origins of Global IR. The Rockefeller Foundation and Realism in Latin America
The Cold War Origins of Global IR. The Rockefeller Foundation and Realist Theory in Latin America
Dominación, resistencia y política
Did Rand get it Right
Making International Things
Behind the Velvet Rope
Seeing with the Strong Programme
The settler colonial roots and neoliberal afterlife of Problem Behavior Theory
The Machine Takes Our Jobs Away
Traveling Concepts
The History of Economics
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 20 |