Authority and the study of French politics
A response to Duclaud‐Williams
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11634658 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Warwick (0000-0001-7792-6475, Simon Fraser University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 287-297 |
| Publication date | 1982-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | West European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402388208424371 |
| OpenAlex | W1988402196 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 9 |
This article reconsiders the value of French authority attitudes for the understanding of French politics in the light of Duclaud‐Williams’ recent critique of the works of Michel Crozier. It is argued that the criticisms made by Duclaud‐Williams do not amount to a refutation of Crozier's thesis or of the type of approach it represents, and that advances in this area are more likely to come from further attempts at identifying empirically the nature and role of French authority norms, such as that of Schonfeld, which is discussed and evaluated here
Economics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Value (mathematics · European Political History Analysis · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1983 - 1990 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |