Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Differing to agree

A reply to Hammersley and Abraham

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11635407
AutoresSharon Gewirtz (0000-0002-5530-1121, King's College London, autor de correspondencia), Alan Cribb (0000-0002-7908-5195, King's College London)
Año2008
Volumen29
Número5
Páginas559-562
Fecha de publicación2008-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaBritish Journal of Sociology of Education (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0142-5692 • E-ISSN: 1465-3346
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01425690802381577
OpenAlexW2076864868
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas3

In this paper Gewirtz and Cribb offer a response to Hammersley and Abraham's criticisms of their arguments about the place of values in social research published in this issue of BJSE. In doing so, they make clear that most of the positions that Hammersley and Abraham attribute to them are ones that they do not identify with and that, like Hammersley and Abraham, they would reject. In order to further clarify and specify their own position, Gewirtz and Cribb argue that: their advocacy of ethical reflexivity rests on the assumption that there are many incompatible sets of values in play within even a single vantage point; researchers should sometimes take an interest in knowledge use although they should not always be required to do so; and, whilst at the level of propositions it is always possible to abstract out and distinguish between factual claims and value claims, at the level of practice there can be significant resonances and linkages between the two, so it is important to be ethically reflexive about these entanglements. Finally, the authors agree that values should not be seen purely as a source of contamination but that attention to values can help to underpin ‘objectivity’

Epistemology · Objectivity (philosophy · Order (exchange · Point (geometry · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Statistics · Value (mathematics · Critical Realism in Sociology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Science and Policy Research

  • Implementing Ethics in Educational Ethnography

    Open Access•Hugh Busher, Alison Fox•Implementing Ethics in…•2019

  • Teacher professional development for improving the intercultural school

    Open Access•Christina Hajisoteriou, Panayiotis Maniatis et al.•Education Inquiry•2018

  • Through the Looking Glass

    Open Access•Yvonne Downs•Power and Education•2011

  • The relationship between ethical positions and methodological approaches

    D Beach, Anita Eriksson•Ethnography & Education•2010

  • Establishing a framework for blending intercultural education with differentiated instruction

    Stavroula Valiandes, Lefkios Neophytou et al.•European Journal of Intercultural…•2018

  • Environmental education research

    Alan Reid•Environmental Education Research•2009

  • The sociology of disability and the struggle for inclusive education

    Julie Allan•British Journal of Sociology of…•2010

  • Reflexivity for what? A response to Gewirtz and Cribb on the role of values in the sociology of education

    M Hammersley•British Journal of Sociology of…•2008

  • Politics, knowledge and objectivity in sociology of education

    John Abraham, Julian Abraham•British Journal of Sociology of…•2008

  • What to do about values in social research

    Sharon Gewirtz, Alan Cribb•British Journal of Sociology of…•2006

Obras citantes distintas7
Citas por año0,41
Intervalo de citas2009 - 2019 (11)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae