The Ethical Review of Medical Research
A Social Movement to Protect the Interests of Research Subjects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11637398 |
|---|---|
| Authors | L W Osborne (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 155-160 |
| Publication date | 1984-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/j.1839-4655.1984.tb00785.x |
| PMID | 11649620 |
| OpenAlex | W2301449117 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This paper is based upon observations made in the United States regarding the operation of the Institutional Review Boards. Institutional Review Boards are an essential part of the American system for the ethical review of human subjects research and it is argued that their importance is due in part to the American approach to the protection of minority groups. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of the Institutional Review Boards since a similar model is being proposed by the National Health & Medical Research Council as part of the ethical review of medical research projects conducted in Australia
Engineering ethics · Ethical issues · Institutional review board · Medical research · Political science · Project commissioning · Psychiatry · Public relations · Publishing · Research ethics · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|