Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Impact of Alumni Connections on Peer Review Ratings and Selection Success Rate in National Research

Bibliographic Data

ID11638101
AuthorsDuckhee Jang (Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Ansan, Korea), Soogwan Doh (0000-0002-9580-9317, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongbuk, Korea, corresponding author), Gil‐mo Kang (Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology), Gil-Mo Kang (Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Ansan, Korea), Dong‐seong Han (National Research Foundation of Korea), Dong-Seong Han (National Research Foundation of Korea, Daejeon, Korea)
Year2016
Volume42
Issue1
Pages116-143
Publication date2016-08-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0162243916665466
OpenAlexW2518532817
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited49

This study seeks to examine the impact of alumni connections between the evaluators and evaluatees on the results of peer review ratings for the Korean national R&D project and selection success rate. Specifically, this study analyzed the evaluation results of 8,402 research proposal entries submitted between 2007 and 2011 for the “general researchers support project,” all in the Natural Science and Engineering areas and sponsored by the National Research Foundation of Korea. Each proposal entry was evaluated by three evaluators, and approximately 39 percent of the proposals had at least one evaluator from the same university. The results of this study showed that evaluators have a tendency to give relatively high scores to research proposals submitted by the alumni of the same universities as their alma mater. Also, when an evaluator from the same university as an evaluatee was included in the evaluator group, the results of this study showed that the percentage of entry submissions was higher compared to the contrary. Such results show that in the process of peer review–based research proposal evaluations for national R&D projects, alumni connections have significant influence on evaluation results in South Korea

Medical education · Peer review · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Selection (genetic algorithm · Computer Science · Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies · Medicine · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review

    Open Access•Emil Bargmann Madsen, Philippe Mongeon et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2025

  • Using peer review to evaluate the societal relevance of humanities research

    Open Access•Stijn Conix, Leander Vignero et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2025

  • Peerless science

    Daryl E Chubin•Peerless science•1990

  • What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?

    Christopher P Hood, Christopher Hood•Public Management Review•2007

  • Peer-review practices of psychological journals

    Open Access•Douglas Peters, Douglas P Peters et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1982

  • Bias in peer review

    Open Access•Carole J Lee, Cassidy R Sugimoto et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2013

  • Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

    Open Access•Christine Wennerås, Agnes Wold et al.•Nature•1997

  • Scientific peer review

    Open Access•Lutz Bornmann•Annual Review of Information…•2011

  • ‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework

    Open Access•Simon Smith, Vivienne Ward et al.•Research Policy•2011

  • Higher education in East Asia and Singapore

    Open Access•Simon Marginson•Higher Education•2011

  • Gender differences in grant peer review

    Open Access•Lutz Bornmann, Ruediger Mutz et al.•Journal of Informetrics•2007

  • Improving the peer-review process for grant applications

    Herbert W Marsh, Upali W Jayasinghe et al.•American Psychologist•2008

  • Measuring Equity

    Open Access•Marcel Chotkowski Lafollette•Science Communication•1994

  • The Gendered Construction of Scientific Excellence

    Open Access•Teresa Rees•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2011

  • Peer Review and Public Policy

    Open Access•D E Chubin, Daryl Chubin et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•1985

  • Sociocultural change and traditional values

    Open Access•Kyoung Ja Hyun•International Journal of…•2001

  • The Republic of science

    Open Access•Michael Polanyi•Minerva•1962

  • Patterns of evaluation in science

    Open Access•Harriet Zuckerman, Robert Κ Merton et al.•Minerva•1971

  • The Place of the 'Core-Set' in Modern Science

    Open Access•H M Collins, Harry Collins•History of Science•1981

  • Elite Education and Social Capital

    Sunhwa Lee, M C Brinton•Sociology of Education•1996

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae