Impact of Alumni Connections on Peer Review Ratings and Selection Success Rate in National Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11638101 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Duckhee Jang (Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Ansan, Korea), Soogwan Doh (0000-0002-9580-9317, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongbuk, Korea, corresponding author), Gil‐mo Kang (Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology), Gil-Mo Kang (Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, Ansan, Korea), Dong‐seong Han (National Research Foundation of Korea), Dong-Seong Han (National Research Foundation of Korea, Daejeon, Korea) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 116-143 |
| Publication date | 2016-08-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243916665466 |
| OpenAlex | W2518532817 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 49 |
This study seeks to examine the impact of alumni connections between the evaluators and evaluatees on the results of peer review ratings for the Korean national R&D project and selection success rate. Specifically, this study analyzed the evaluation results of 8,402 research proposal entries submitted between 2007 and 2011 for the “general researchers support project,” all in the Natural Science and Engineering areas and sponsored by the National Research Foundation of Korea. Each proposal entry was evaluated by three evaluators, and approximately 39 percent of the proposals had at least one evaluator from the same university. The results of this study showed that evaluators have a tendency to give relatively high scores to research proposals submitted by the alumni of the same universities as their alma mater. Also, when an evaluator from the same university as an evaluatee was included in the evaluator group, the results of this study showed that the percentage of entry submissions was higher compared to the contrary. Such results show that in the process of peer review–based research proposal evaluations for national R&D projects, alumni connections have significant influence on evaluation results in South Korea
Medical education · Peer review · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Selection (genetic algorithm · Computer Science · Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies · Medicine · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Peerless science
What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?
Peer-review practices of psychological journals
Bias in peer review
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
Scientific peer review
‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework
Higher education in East Asia and Singapore
Gender differences in grant peer review
Improving the peer-review process for grant applications
Measuring Equity
The Gendered Construction of Scientific Excellence
Peer Review and Public Policy
Sociocultural change and traditional values
The Republic of science
Patterns of evaluation in science
The Place of the 'Core-Set' in Modern Science
Elite Education and Social Capital
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |