Rational Disagreement in Peer Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11638113 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stevan Harnad (0000-0001-6153-1129, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 55-62 |
| Publication date | 1985-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/016224398501000307 |
| OpenAlex | W2021244341 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
A certain degree of disagreement is not only a healthy but an informative and even essential aspect of\nscientific activity
Peer review · Political science · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Law · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions
Urteilen unter Beobachtung
The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process
Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings
Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed
The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome
The Predictive Ability of Peer Review of Grant Proposals
Sorting the esoteica from the exoterica
The postgutenberg galaxy
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,23 |
| Citation span | 1987 - 2019 (33) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |