Act now and sign our joint statement!’ What role do online global group petitions play in transnational movement networks
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11638530 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael Strange (0000-0002-2903-7267, Malmö University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2011 |
| Volumen | 33 |
| Número | 8 |
| Páginas | 1236-1253 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2011-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Media Culture & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0163-4437 • E-ISSN: 1460-3675 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0163443711422461 |
| OpenAlex | W2128835873 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 30 |
The article focuses on a frequently used but under-researched protest medium through which transnational movement networks express their collective demands – what are termed here ‘global group petitions’ (GGPs), and activists themselves call ‘sign-on statements’ or ‘joint statements’. GGPs are online petitions typically framed as ‘global’ and linking sometimes hundreds of advocacy groups behind a common set of critical statements contesting global politics. Despite a burgeoning literature examining the use of digital media by movement networks, the article shows that GGPs are a distinct form of activism which to date has been overlooked by social science. Studying GGPs helps explore a series of issues central to understanding the role of advocacy groups in global politics, including their internal power relations (i.e. between North and South). Presenting empirical analysis and interviews with activists relating to five GGPs used in the course of a single transnational movement network – against negotiations to expand the World Trade Organization’s General Agreement on Trade-in-Services – the article concludes that whilst GGPs are not as ‘global’ or representative of a movement network as they may claim, their value is in facilitating momentum and a process of dialogue between potential advocacy partners
Collective action · Media studies · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Public relations · Sign (mathematics · Social media · Social movement · Sociology · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Social Media and Politics
Introduction. La participation politique en ligne au révélateur du pétitionnement électronique
Quand les e-pétitions influencent-elles la décision politique ? Une analyse du système de pétitions électroniques de la Chambre des députés du Luxembourg
Twenty one years of HIV/Aids medicines in the newspaper
Things Fall Apart?” Prospects of Solidarity in a Precarious World
Exploring E-petitioning and media
Grievance Articulation and Community Reactions in the Men's Rights Movement Online
Examining political mobilization of online communities through e-petitioning behavior in We the People
Pipelines, Petitions, and Protests in the Internet Age
'Innocent Women and Children'
Applying Discourse Theory
Communicating Global Activism
Unexpected Power
International Plug 'n Play? Citizen Activism, the Internet, and Global Public Policy
Alter-activism
Taking Part
Email lists and participatory democracy in the European Social Forum
Globalization and Human Rights
Globalizing Resistance
Activists Online and Offline
Global-net for Global Movements? A Network of Networks for a Movement of Movements
Setting the Advocacy Agenda
The Formation and Manipulation of Collective Identity
Understanding Meaning in Movements
Building an Electronic Repertoire of Contention
Protest, Cyberactivism and New Social Movements
The Uses and Misuses of Globalization in the Study of Social Movements
Transnational Advocacy, Global Civil Society? Emerging Evidence from the Field of Education
The Uneven Geography of Global Civil Society
Crosscurrents
The Limits of Internationalization
Framing Processes and Social Movements
Solidarity in the age of globalization
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,73 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |