Alexander Pruss on Love and the Meaningfulness of Sex

In this essay I explore Alexander Pruss' conceptions of love and sexual desire. I argue that he fails to provide a convincing account of either and that one reason for this is that he ignores far too much relevant material in philosophy and the arts that needs to be taken into account in a thorough investigation of such matters. I argue further that Pruss' understanding of love and sex is highly moralized, meaning that his discussion is not at all sensitive to the actual human experience of these, but consistently falsifies them. I also argue that the teleology to which Pruss appeals in order to ground his claim that, in the sexual act, the bodies of the lovers are striving for reproduction, is implausible and, further, that, even were it not, we could not infer from such teleology the moral conclusions that Pruss wishes to extract from it

Psychoanalysis · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Psychology · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

• On Aristotle and Greek tragedy

  John Jones•On Aristotle and Greek tragedy•1980

  Add to list