The economic returns to education in Mexico
A comparison between urban and rural areas
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11651267 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Juan Luis Ordaz-Díaz (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 2008 |
| Issue | 96 |
| Pages | 265-282 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-07 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | CEPAL review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0251-2920 • E-ISSN: 1684-0348 |
| Publisher | United Nations Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.18356/665c1845-en |
| OpenAlex | W2284146204 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
This study uses the Mincer equation to calculate the private economic returns to education in urban and rural areas of Mexico in the 1994-2005 period. The findings indicate that investing in education is profitable in both types of area. Returns to education were found to be greater in the countryside than in cities in most of the years analysed and at every level of education. Education in rural areas tends to be more profitable for women at the basic education levels and for men at the higher levels. In urban areas, education proved to be more profitable for men at the primary and higher levels and, in some years, for women at the lower and upper secondary levels
Demographic economics · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Higher education · Political science · Primary education · Rural area · Socioeconomics · Economic Growth and Productivity · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Rendimientos del capital humano en las microempresas de la frontera norte de México
Economic and Political Inclusion in Human Development Conditional Income Transfer Programmes in Latin America
Designing unemployment insurance for developing countries
Return to education in Azerbaijan. Does gender matter
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2022 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |