Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rethinking China’s emerging case law system

Empirical insights and challenges to prevailing assumptions

Bibliographic Data

ID11652436
AuthorsLu Xu (0009-0003-0179-9977, Lancaster University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume45
Issue4
Pages554-576
Publication date2025-11-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegal Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0261-3875 • E-ISSN: 1748-121X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/lst.2025.10092
OpenAlexW4416193788
LanguageEN

This paper examines China’s emerging case law system through an empirical analysis of more than 10,000 court judgments issued between 2019 and 2021. It challenges prevailing academic views that Guiding Cases are ‘de facto binding’ on Chinese courts and that China’s case law system could be interpreted through a common law lens. Instead, the study shows that the Chinese approach is characterised by distinct objectives, methodologies, and applications. The paper further highlights the practice of ‘mandatory search for similar cases’, which has substantially expanded the role of cases in judicial decision-making. China’s case law system remains in its formative stages, marked by notable uncertainties and challenges. This research underscores the importance of sustained empirical inquiry into legal rules and practices to better understand the trajectory of China’s case law system and the broader implications of this novel approach for contemporary judicial practice

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae