Architecture as commodity fetishism. Some cautionary comments on ‘Green Design’
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11655120 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Peter Dickens (University of Sussex, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1993 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 148-152 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1993-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Housing Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0267-3037 • E-ISSN: 1466-1810 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02673039308720757 |
| OpenAlex | W2093170662 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 5 |
’Buildings are responsible for more external pollution than any other product’. (D. Mckenzie, 1991)
Aesthetics · Art · Commodity · Economics · Fetishism · Market economy · Neoclassical economics · Sociology · Visual arts · American Environmental and Regional History · Anthropology · Architecture, Modernity, and Design · Architecture
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |