Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11655757 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carol A Chapelle (0000-0001-6383-5118, Iowa State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 157-187 |
| Publication date | 1994-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Second language Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0267-6583 • E-ISSN: 1477-0326 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/026765839401000203 |
| OpenAlex | W2051192875 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 30 |
Second language (L2) researchers (Singleton and Little, 1991) have sug gested that C-tests, developed as norm-referenced measures for proficiency and placement testing (Klein-Braley, 1985), can be used in L2 vocabulary research. This article illustrates how researchers can bring to bear essentials of measurement theory on L2 research by weighing validity justifications pertaining to use of the C-test method for vocabulary assessment in L2 research. Validity is defined using the predominant framework from current measurement theory (Messick, 1989) and its relevance for L2 research is explained. The cornerstone of the definition is construct validity, which requires a definition of the construct to be measured - interlanguage vocabulary (i.e., vocabulary ability). A theoretical definition of vocabulary ability is presented and used to consider justifications for and against interpreting C-test performance as indicative of vocabulary ability. On the basis of evidence concerning construct validity and utility as well as the consequences of interpretations, the potentials and limitations of the C-test method for L2 vocabulary research are identified
Cognitive psychology · Construct (python library · Construct validity · Developmental psychology · Interlanguage · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Psychometrics · Relevance (law · Test (biology · Test validity · Vocabulary · Vocabulary development · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Multilingual Education and Policy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Proficiency Assessment Standards in Second Language Acquisition Research
Lexical Sophistication as a Multidimensional Phenomenon
Vocabulary Depth Knowledge and Academic Reading Comprehension of Business Efl Undergraduates
Mediated receptive multilingualism
The Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language - Revised
A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability
Validation of a web-based ESL test
A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests
Modern language testing at the turn of the century
Comparing C-tests and Yes/No vocabulary size tests as predictors of receptive language skills
A framework for second language vocabulary assessment
The relationship between Toefl vocabulary items and meaning, association, collocation and word-class knowledge
Phonological Vocabulary Size
English Language Learning and Technology
Validating a Multi-Dimensional Rating Scale for Lexical Proficiency in L2 Academic Speech
Language testing and assessment (Part I)
Words for inclusion
The relationship between vocabulary size and depth for ESP/EAP learners
The cagey C-test construct
Assessing proficiency through word associations
Learning and processing L2 vocabulary
Artificial Intelligence-Generated and Human Expert-Designed Vocabulary Tests
Language, Context, and Text
Does Washback Exist?
Interlanguage is not a state of mind
Restructuring
'Sequence' and 'Order' in the Development of L2 Lexis
Integrating Research Areas
Better theory for better tests
Test validation and cognitive psychology
Using dictionaries to estimate vocabulary size
A survey of research on the C-Test1
Cloze method
A cloze-up on the C-Test
An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests
Objective Tests as Instruments of Psychological Theory
The Construct Validation of Some Components of Communicative Proficiency
Was Gordon Allport a trait theorist
Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing
Construct validity
Universals of Lexical Simplification
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,76 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2026 (30) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |