Feature reassembly and L1 preemption
Acquiring CLLD in L2 Italian and L2 Romanian
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11655810 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Liz Smeets (0000-0002-5285-6703, York University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 559-589 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Second language Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0267-6583 • E-ISSN: 1477-0326 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02676583231156307 |
| PMID | 39092003 |
| OpenAlex | W4377242234 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 43 |
This study investigates feature acquisition and feature reassembly associated with Clitic Left Dislocation (CLLD). The article compares the acquisition of CLLD in second language (L2) Italian to L2 Romanian to examine effects of first language (L1) transfer, construction frequency and the type of interface involved (external vs. internal interface) within the same syntactic construction. The results from an acceptability judgment task and a written elicitation task show that while English near-native speakers of Italian/Romanian acquired the L2 constraints on CLLD, which is [+anaphor] for Italian and [+specific] for Romanian, data from both Romanian L2 learners of Italian and Italian L2 learners of Romanian showed persistent L1 transfer effects. Target-like acquisition for these groups requires both grammatical expansion and retraction; Romanian CLLD requires the addition of an L1-unavailable [+specific] feature and the loss of a [+anaphor] feature, while Italian CLLD requires the addition of an L1-unavailable [+anaphor] and the loss of a [+specific] feature. The reported findings extend evidence in favour of the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis to the syntax-discourse interface, as reassembly of interpretational features associated with CLLD proved more difficult than feature acquisition. While learners at the near-native levels were able to broaden the contexts that allow a clitic in the L2 (grammatical expansion), L1 preemption difficulties were attested as well. This was the case regardless of the frequency of the relevant construction in the input and the type of L2 feature that needed to be added/removed
Clitic · Comprehension approach · Feature (linguistics · First language · Language transfer · Linguistics · Natural language · Natural language processing · Romanian · Second-language acquisition · Syntax · Computer Science · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Testing the current models of third language acquisition
A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure
Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition
The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery
Specific Indefinites and the Information Structure Theory of Topics
The syntax-semantics of bare and definite plural subjects in the L2 Spanish of English natives
Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language
L2 acquisition of Bulgarian clitic doubling
Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface
Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish
Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian
The acquisition of object movement in Dutch
Second language research
Formal Principles of Language Acquisition
Clitic-Doubled Left Dislocation in Heritage Spanish
Pragmatics and Linguistics
Pinning down the concept of "interface" in bilingualism
Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development
L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model
Topic Strategies and the Internal Structure of Nominal Arguments in Greek and Italian
A more careful look at the syntax-discourse interface
Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences
The Comparative Fallacy in Interlanguage Studies
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |