What We Know About Women's Technology Use, Avoidance, and Abandonment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11659690 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcia J Scherer (0000-0001-8374-6526, Rochester Institute of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 117-132 |
| Publication date | 1994-02-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Women & Therapy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0270-3149 • E-ISSN: 1541-0315 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1300/j015v14n03_12 |
| OpenAlex | W2042914980 |
| Language | EN |
With the increasing availability of assistive technologies, persons with disabilities have unprecedented opportunities for full societal participation. But women, especially women with disabilities, have typically not had much exposure to and experience with technologies and can find them intimidating and frustrating. While many women use technologies regularly and with satisfaction, others use theminfrequently and with reluctance, avoid them entirely, or try them only to abandon their use. This article discusses factors associated with technology use, avoidance, or abandonment as being outcomes of the interactionof: (a) The particular technology (design, service delivery), (b) the person's abilities and personality (judgment, expectations), (c) characteristics of the disability (type, severity), and (d) the person's psychosocial environment (social support, training and education). Assessment instruments exist comprehensively profile individuals in the four areas so the most appropriate technologies can be recommended and needed modifications to technologies made
Abandonment (legal · Assistive technology · Business · Emerging technologies · Political science · Psychosocial · Psychotherapist · Service (business · Applied Psychology · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Computer Science · Psychology · Social Psychology · Technology Use by Older Adults · Marketing
| Highly cited | No |
|---|