Movie or Monograph? A Historian/Filmmaker's Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11664502 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Natalie Zemon Davis (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 45-48 |
| Publication date | 2003-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Public Historian (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0272-3433 • E-ISSN: 1533-8576 |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/tph.2003.25.3.45 |
| OpenAlex | W2005908374 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
Using her experience as historical consultant for Le Retour de Martin Guerre, the author weighs the advantages and disadvantages of describing the past in the language of film and the language of professional prose. She concludes that both forms of communication should be used: historians should amplify their role as consultants or filmmakers through discussion and written debate
Art · Art history · Film director · Media studies · Movie theater · Perspective (graphical · Sociology · Visual arts · African history and culture studies · French Historical and Cultural Studies · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,32 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2022 (16) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |