How the Spending Patterns of Cities Change

Do city governments generally behave in keeping with the assumptions underlying the incremental model when they allocate their resources among competing activities? That is to say, do they try to maintain everyone's historical “fair share” of the budget in order to minimize disputes among rival participants in the decision process? Earlier studies have lacked sufficient data to address this question. However, with data from 105 West German cities, the present study is able to provide an answer. The resource allocation behavior of many of those cities seems to conform with the incremental model's assumptions. Yet for other cities, major changes in expenditure patterns from one year to the next are common. The differences in the variability of expenditure patterns across the cities studied are far from random. They are systematically associated with certain characteristics of the municipal environment. These associations, in turn, offer plausible hints about the process that leads to change in cities' spending patterns

Economics · Incrementalism · Political science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Local Government Finance and Decentralization

• Top-Down Budgeting, Fiscal Stress and Budgeting Theory

  Open Access•Rebecca Hendrick•The American Review of Public…•1989

  Add to list

• Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s

  Open Access•Ringa Raudla, Riin Savi et al.•International Review of…•2015

  Add to list

• Cutback Budgeting

  Robert Berne, Robert M Berne et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1993

  Add to list

• Setting New Spending Priorities in Japanese Prefectures

  Open Access•Robert C Rickards•Comparative Political Studies•1985

  Add to list