Samuel Bailey and the Subversion of the Classical Theory of Value

A Note

Bibliographic Data

ID11697372
AuthorsGiancarlo De Vivo (University of Naples Federico II, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume33
Issue1
Pages55-60
Publication date2014-05-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueContributions to Political Economy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-5921 • E-ISSN: 1464-3588
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/cpe/bzu006
OpenAlexW2152717906
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited6

This note deals with the rôle Bailey played in the subversion of the Classical theory of value. It is argued that there was one crucial element which he contributed to this development, viz. the distinction of commodities into three classes, each having its own law of value: the identification of an intermediate class, made of ‘Commodities, in the production of which some persons possess greater facilities than the rest of the community, and which therefore the competition of the latter cannot increase, except at a greater cost’, paved the way to the conception (which however Bailey did not achieve) that there may be a functional relationship between unit cost of production and quantity produced; this would eliminate a major stumbling block which the condition price equal cost constituted for a supply and demand theory of value: for demand to have an influence on price determination, unit costs of production cannot be fixed, but must vary with the quantity produced

Economics · Epistemology · Mathematical economics · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Statistics · Subversion · Value (mathematics · Value theory · Economic Theory and Institutions · Mathematics · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub