The Impressment of Foreign-Born Soldiers in the Union Army
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11698635 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael J Douma (0000-0002-6745-3085, Georgetown University, corresponding author), Michael Douma (0000-0001-9882-5462), Anders Bo Rasmussen (0000-0001-9817-9595), Robert O Faith (University of Akron), Robert Faith |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 76-106 |
| Publication date | 2019-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of American Ethnic History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0278-5927 • E-ISSN: 1936-4695 |
| Publisher | University of Illinois Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5406/jamerethnhist.38.3.0076 |
| OpenAlex | W2745149772 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
In 1862–1863 well over one thousand foreign-born men living in the United States argued that they had been illegally drafted into Union military service. Fearing a diplomatic row, the Lincoln administration sought to clarify the rules of draft eligibility and its relation to citizenship. William Seward, secretary of state, determined to include in the pool of potential draftees men who had filed their declaration of intent to become American citizens and men who had voted in any election in the United States. Seward’s policy, already in action in 1862, partially codified in the Enrollment Act of March 3, 1863, and further enunciated in circulars from the Departments of State and War, broadened and redefined the nature of American citizenship. By highlighting the parallels to earlier forms of impressment, and breaking new ground with a quantitative analysis of the Department of State’s Case Files on Drafted Aliens, we argue that this history of forced military service for foreign-born soldiers during the American Civil War should be considered an example of impressment. With additional source material from archives in England, the Netherlands, and Denmark, we demonstrate the extent of Union impressment and its transnational character. Concerns about forced service were widespread and had significant consequences for Union foreign relations with European countries and for immigrant communities domestically. Official complaints about impressment represented a new kind of draft resistance, in which legal and political knowledge, as well as local and regional immigrant networks, were essential for securing freedom from military service
Administration (probate law · Citizenship · Immigration · Military service · Parallels · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · American History and Culture · Law · Race, History, and American Society
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |