Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hispanic Racialization, Citizenship, and the Colorado Border Blockade of 1936

Bibliographic Data

ID11699435
AuthorsMonica W Varsanyi (0000-0001-7348-389X, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume40
Issue1
Pages5-39
Publication date2020-10-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of American Ethnic History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0278-5927 • E-ISSN: 1936-4695
PublisherUniversity of Illinois Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5406/jamerethnhist.40.1.0005
OpenAlexW3097666749
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited8

In April of 1936, Governor Edwin “Big Ed” Johnson of Colorado declared martial law in a one-mile strip along the state’s southern border with New Mexico, claiming that an invasion of “aliens and indigents” threatened the well-being of Colorado and its citizens. In addition to literally placing a militarized boundary between the more Anglo state of Colorado and the heavily Hispanic state of New Mexico, Johnson’s blockade also heightened contestations over the social boundary between who belonged and who fell outside of citizenship and belonging. Those crossing the New Mexico-Colorado border for work included Mexican immigrants as well as New Mexican Hispanics who were long-time US citizens, most of whom were racialized as undesirable foreigners by many Anglo residents. Interestingly, during the blockade, many native-born Hispanics in New Mexico and Colorado also characterized Mexican immigrants in a negative light, while simultaneously and vigorously asserting their belonging as Spanish American citizens of the United States. The scholarly literature on the racialization of Hispanics has generally approached Mexican-origin people as a unitary group, explored their racial identity in contrast to Anglos, and, less often, taken into account tensions over racialization as they played out between different Hispanic groups. In response, this article details how Johnson’s blockade contributed to the racialization—by both Anglos and Hispanics—of Mexican immigrants and Hispanics in the Southwest during the New Deal Era. This case study also offers a rare example of a state’s attempt to usurp the federal government’s plenary power over immigration during the twentieth century, a time when the federal government’s control over immigration was relatively unquestioned

Citizenship · Criminology · Immigration · Political science · Politics · Psychological nativism · Race (biology · Racialization · Sociology · State (computer science · Diaspora, migration, transnational identity · Gender Studies · Latin American and Latino Studies · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

  • Counting the State

    Open Access•Robin Dale Jacobson•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2023

  • Lunatics, Idiots, Paupers, and Negro Seamen—Immigration Federalism and the Early American State

    Open Access•Anna O Law•Studies in American Political…•2014

  • Bright vs. blurred boundaries

    R Alba•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2005

  • Fighting for Caucasian Rights

    Thomas A Guglielmo•Journal of American History•2006

  • Expelling the Poor

    Hidetaka Hirota•Expelling the Poor•2016

  • Racial Reorganization and the United States Census 1850-1930

    Open Access•Jennifer Hochschild, Jennifer L Hochschild et al.•Studies in American Political…•2008

  • Unauthorized Welfare

    C Fox•Journal of American History•2016

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae