Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Recalcitrance of Aggression

An Aporetic Moment in Cicero’s De inventione

Bibliographic Data

ID11728322
AuthorsJames L Kastely (0009-0009-5744-9283, corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume20
Issue3
Pages235-262
Publication date2002-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRhetorica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0734-8584 • E-ISSN: 1533-8541
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/rht.2002.0008
OpenAlexW4324005608
LanguageEN

In De inventione Cicero defends rhetoric by presenting a myth of the progress of the human species from asocial brutes to rational and social creatures. However, as Cicero explains the corruption of rhetoric by cunning individuals moved only by private interest, his myth reveals the present situation to be every bit as divided and contentious as the mythic state of nature. His myth discovers that rhetoric cannot escape corruption. Stasis theory, however, offers the possibility of an ethical rhetorical practice. By formalizing the agonistic clash of interests as a method of invention, stasis theory transforms a source of social instability into a resource for on-going social reinvention

Art · Cicero · Language change · Literature · Mythology · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Social reform · Classical Antiquity Studies · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae