Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Classicism, barbarism and Roman warfare

The figure of the cavalryman in the Late Roman Empire

Bibliographic Data

ID11730730
AuthorsMaxime Petitjean (corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume22
Pages255-262
Publication date2014-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAntiquité Tardive (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1250-7334 • E-ISSN: 2295-9718
PublisherBrepols (PUBLISHER • BE)
DOI10.1484/j.at.5.103191
OpenAlexW2260355351
LanguageEN
Citations received1

This paper will discuss the image of the cavalryman in the sources of the late Roman Empire. It aims to refute Anthony Kaldellis’ thesis on the preface of the History of the wars of Justinian. Unlike the American scholar, I argue here that much of the authors of the time, including Procopius, were favourable to the development of cavalry in the Roman army. This demonstraties a significant change in Roman atitudes towards warfare. Indeed, while the legionary infantryman was seen as a major symbol of the Roman military ethos during the early Empire, the mounted warrior gains visibility in the sources from the late third century onwards. This change is due to the raising of State guerrilla warfare to the rank of main defensive strategy by the late Roman Empire and has also connections with the emulation of “barbarian” military tactics. It goes along with a renewal of the official dicourse on mounted archery, once depreciated by classical authors. Julian, Procopius and Agathias do not hesitate to make of the hippotoxotês the Homeric warrior par excellence, exceeding in value all other types of fighters. Official art and religion are not to be outdone; so much so that the figure of cavalryman, caparisoned in the oriental way and equipped with the nomadic bow finally outshines that of the heavy infanmtryman in many documentary fields. The analysis thus reveals the importance of cultural factors in the understanding of ancient military history. If the inertia of the classical ideology may hinder the adoption of new practices, the integration of foreign militry traditions must be justified by the dominnat culture to be considered legitimate. This evolution of the discourse on war is not without consequences for the entire imperial military policy

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art history · Barbarian · Barbarism · Civilization · Classicism · Empire · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Roman art · Roman Empire · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Architectural Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Law

  • Was There a Military Revolution at the End of Antiquity

    Conor Whately•Journal of Ancient History•2021

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae