Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Xenophon and Lysias on the Arginousai Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID11733015
AuthorsAggelos Kapellos (University of Ioannina, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume7
Issue2
Publication date2019-12-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueErga-Logoi Rivista di storia letteratura diritto e culture dell antichità (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2280-9678 • E-ISSN: 2282-3212
PublisherLed Edizioni Universitarie (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.7358/erga-2019-002-kape
OpenAlexW2995122841
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited20

Lysias argues in XII 36 that if the Athenians condemned the Arginousai generals it would be right to condemn the Thirty. This argument implies that the generals were guilty and asserts that there was a strong conviction on the part of the Athenians that they should punish the generals. This is a clever rhetorical argument, which conformed to the Athenian ideology according to which the demos was blameless. However, Lysias avoids mentioning that the Athenians violated their law and tried the generals without a proper trial. This happens because the orator comments on the trial retrospectively. If he had to admit that the procedure was illegal, this would clearly have weakened his case; so he does not make this mistake

Argument (complex analysis · Conviction · Ideology · Linguistics · Mistake · Political science · Politics · Rhetorical question · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classical Antiquity Studies · Law · Medicine · Philosophy

  • The Role of Socrates in the Arginusae Affair

    Orestis Karatzoglou•Trends in Classics•2024

  • Antiphon and Andocides

    Douglas M Macdowell, Michael Gagarin•Antiphon and Andocides•1998

  • Xenophon and Greek Political Thought

    Open Access•Sarah Brown Ferrario•Cambridge Companion to Xenophon•2016

  • Accountability in Athenian Politics

    Open Access•Jon Elster•Democracy, Accountability, and…•1999

  • A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia (Revised Edition)

    Aristotle Aristotle, Aristotle  et al.•A commentary on the Aristotelian…•1981

  • Did the athenian courts attempt to achieve consistency? Oral tradition and written records in the athenian administration of justice

    Edward M Harris•Politics of orality•2007

  • From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law

    Martin Ostwald•From Popular Sovereignty to the…•1986

  • Politics and the Street in Democratic Athens

    Open Access•Alex Gottesman•Politics and the Street in…•2014

  • Law and Justice in the Courts of Classical Athens

    Open Access•Adriaan Lanni•Law and Justice in the Courts of…•2006

  • Rhetoric of Conspiracy in Ancient Athens

    Joseph Roisman•Rhetoric of Conspiracy in Ancient…•2006

  • Adeimantos at Aegospotami

    Open Access•Aggelos Kapellos•Historia•2009

  • Talking About Myself

    Open Access•Han Lamers, ADRIAAN RADEMAKER•The Classical Quarterly•2007

  • Political Trials in Ancient Greece

    Richard Bauman, Richard A Bauman•Political Trials in Ancient…•2020

  • Addresses to the Jury in the Attic Orators

    Andrew Wolpert•The American Journal of Philology•2003

  • Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens

    Josiah Ober•Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens•1989

  • What Counts as the demos? Some Notes on the Relationship between the Jury and "The People" in Classical Athens

    Alastair J L Blanshard, Alastair Blanshard•Phoenix•2004

  • Some Aspects of Lysias' Argumentation

    J J Bateman, Josiah Bateman•Phoenix•1962

  • Socrates and Legal Obligation

    R G Frey, Renato Frey et al.•Phoenix•1983

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae