Modeling Ethnic Protest
The Case of the Middle East and Central Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11745992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emile Sahliyeh (The University of Texas at Arlington, corresponding author), Sangeeta Sinha (The University of Texas at Arlington), Vijayan K Pillai (0000-0002-3976-4564, The University of Texas at Arlington) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-21 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | African and Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1569-2094 • E-ISSN: 1569-2108 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/156921002x00013 |
| OpenAlex | W2065331933 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 17 |
Theory: Literature on ethnic protest in the Middle East and Central Asia does not provide empirical measures necessary for rigorous hypothesis testing, nor does it incorporate a comprehensive theoretical foundation needed to identify the conditions for ethnic protest. There is also no consensus on the causes of ethnic protest in the Middle East and Central Asia. Hypotheses: To improve our ability to explain ethnic protest in the Middle East and Central Asia and to identify the necessary conditions for ethnic dissent, we test five hypotheses embodied in grievance and political mobilization. The literature on ethnic protest in the Middle East and Central Asia references both models but does not systematically test their relevance. Methodology: We use Logistic Regression to test the explanatory potential of the five hypotheses of the Grievance and Mobilization models. We use Ted Gurr's Minorities at Risk data set, which presents data on 40 ethnic groups in the Middle East and Central Asia. The dependent variable is protest for 1990-95. Findings: Our research does not lend much empirical support for the grievance model, which dominates the Middle Eastern and Central Asian area study literature. Cultural identity and religious freedom variables of grievance model do not provide sufficient condition for the outbreak of ethnic protest. The mobilization model has better explanatory power. It lends significant support to the three hypotheses associated with the mobilization model and suggests that ethnic protest is more likely to occur under conditions of organizational cohesiveness, low levels of autocracy, and international support
China · Development economics · East Asia · Economics · Ethnic group · Grievance · Middle East · Political science · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis · Law · Political Conflict and Governance
The Black man's burden
Minorities at risk
The politics of cultural pluralism
Peoples versus states
The Politics of Palestinian Nationalism
Nationalism and Belonging in India, Pakistan and South Central Asia
The Shi'a of Saudi Arabia
The Palestinian Identity Among Camp Residents
Palestinian Refugee Camp Life in Lebanon
Sources of Palestinian Nationalism
Amal and the Shi'a
Ethnic Conflict in World Politics
The Iranian Revolution
The Middle East
Social Justice and State Capacity
Force, ideology and contract
Theories of revolution reconsidered
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,11 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2015 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |