Teaching the field
The order, ordering, and scale of knowledge
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11755192 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alberto Corsín Jiménez (0000-0002-1360-4060, University of Oxford, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 1970-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropology Matters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1758-6453 • E-ISSN: 1758-6453 |
| Publisher | NomadIT (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.22582/am.v5i1.127 |
| OpenAlex | W3147141068 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
In this paper I would like to reflect on the confrontational and contradictory forces that make us ‘ethnographers’ and ‘anthropologists’, and of the consequences that accompany the way we position ourselves against our discipline and against ourselves as practitioners of that discipline. The paper may thus be read as an elucidation of boundary-formations: of how we classify and fence the kind of knowledge that we believe to be studying/making, and how we concomitantly circumscribe and define ourselves as agents in doing such classification. In effect, this amounts to examining the ways in which we relate to the bodies of knowledge that make up our identities as ‘anthropologists’, looking at how we sort out the information that makes up such bodies of knowledge and that entitles us to ‘know’ anything at all
Boundary (topology · Epistemology · Ethnography · Fence (mathematics · Field (mathematics · Geography · Information retrieval · Order (exchange · Scale (ratio · Sociology · sort · Anthropology · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Philosophy · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |