Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Turkic Identity in Mongol and Post-Mongol Central Asia and the Qipchaq Steppe

Bibliographic Data

ID11797441
AuthorsJoo‐yup Lee (0000-0002-6337-3977, corresponding author), Joo-Yup Lee (0009-0001-6525-6782, University of Toronto)
Year2019
Publication date2019-12-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
PublisherOxford University PressNew York, NY (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.443
OpenAlexW3030350271
ISBN9780190277727
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

The Turkic identity that first emerged with the rise of the Türk empire in the mid-6th century did not encompass all Turkic-speaking nomads in the Inner Asian world. The Türks, who founded the first Turkic nomadic empire, reserved the term Türk for themselves. In turn, the Uighurs and the (Yenisei) Qirghiz, who succeeded the Türks in the Mongolian steppes, did not identify themselves as Türk. As a result, after the final collapse of the Türk empire in the mid-8th century, Turkic identity did not survive among non-Türk groups in the Mongolian steppes. Turk became a much broader identity in the Islamic world. Muslim writers spread the term Turk (plural Atrāk ), virtually using it as a synonym for Inner Asian nomads including both Turkic- and non–Turkic-speaking groups. Accordingly, when the Mongols entered the Islamic world, Muslim writers in general identified them as Turks. The Muslim view of the Turks as Inner Asian nomads was adopted by the Mongols of the Ilkhanate and the Mongol successors in Central Asia (Timurids, Moghuls, and Shibanid Uzbeks), who viewed themselves as the most prominent branch of the Turks. (The designation Central Asia is used here for the interior region stretching from the Caspian Sea in the west to Xinjiang, China in the east. Inner Asia denotes the steppe regions.) Essentially, their Turkic identity was a non-Tajik, Inner Asian nomadic identity, not a non-Mongol, Türk-related identity. Importantly, it encompassed Mongol identity. In the histories and documents produced in the Ilkhanate and the Mongol successor states in Central Asia, Turk in the phrase “Turk and Tajik” and various Chinggisid and Timurid genealogies primarily denoted the Mongols. However, a Central Asian type of Turkic identity was non-existent in the Qipchaq Steppe during the Mongol and post-Mongol period. Apparently, the term Turk had not been used as a self-appellation among such non-Türk groups of the Qipchaq Steppe as the Qipchaqs. Likewise, the Mongol successors of the Qipchaq Steppe (Uzbeks, Qazaqs, and Tatars) did not self-identify as Turks. However, like their Central Asian counterparts, they identified themselves as Mongol descendants

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Central asia · Empire · Genealogy · Geography · Identity (music · Islam · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Linguistics and Cultural Studies

  • The Arghūn State in Qandahar and the New World Economy, 1479–1522

    Ali Anooshahr•Journal of the Economic and…•2023

  • The Symbiosis of Turk and Tajik

    Maria Eva Subtelny•Central Asia in Historical…•2018

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae